摘要
译者是翻译活动中最活跃的因素,但在不同的翻译研究阶段,人们对译者主体性的认识不尽相同。在后现代语境中就存在着两种倾向:一方是受现象学、哲学阐释学等后现代哲学和文论思想的影响,认为译者是文本的阐释者,进而是文本阐释的操控者;另一方则受新历史主义思潮主要是福柯的“权力话语”的影响,从而认为译者是受诸多社会因素的操控。分析这两种倾向,指出其各自认识上的片面性,提出了译者反操控的命题。
Translator is the most active entity in the process of translation; however, scholars hold conflicting views on how actively translator＇s subjectivity works in translating. In the post-modernist context, two diverged tendencies exist： one holds the stance, influenced by Phenomenology and Hermeneutics and other literary reviews, that translator is entitled to paraphrasing the text, what is more, translator manipulates the text; the other, under the influence of Neo-histoficism and Foucault＇ s theory of Power and Discourse, takes the social factors into consideration and advances the idea that translator is manipulated by multi-social factors such as political ideology, cultural deposits, historical tradition and social ethics. This paper looks into these two tendencies and points out impartiality of each; and lastly, puts forward the idea of translator＇ s anti-manipulatiun.
出处
《四川外语学院学报》
北大核心
2005年第5期124-128,共5页
Journal of Sichuan International Studies University
关键词
译者
主体性
操控
反操控
translator
subjectivity
manipulation
anti-manipulation
