期刊文献+

三种常用行为评价量表应用于北京中学生的结果比较 被引量:11

The Application of CBCL,YSR and TRF for 12-18 Years of Age Students in Beijing
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨Achenbach 编制的测查儿童行为问题最著名的三份量表,即:儿童行为问题父母评价量表(CBCL)、青少年自我评价量表(YSR)和教师评价量表(TRF)之间的相关性及适用性。方法:采用CBCL、YSR、TRF 量表,对北京市6所中学1410名12~18岁青少年进行调查,并对结果进行统计分析。结果: CBCL、YSR、TRF 量表的条目与总分的Cronbach α系数分别为0.96、0.95、0.99,分半信度系数分别为0.93、0.89、0.97,说明三份量表均具有很好的内部一致性。YSR 的得分普遍高于其它两个量表,CBCL 得分次之,TRF 得分最低(少数个别因子除外)。CBCL 与YSR 的得分在全部样本、不同性别、初、高中生均相关(r=0.35~0.60,P<0.01);CBCL 与TRF 在注意力问题和攻击性行为得分上有一定相关(r=0.13~0.25,P<0.05)。CBCL 量表中学习成绩与各分量表因子均呈负相关(r=-0.13~-0.39,P<0.01),TRF 量表中适应能力和学习成绩与各分量表因子均呈负相关(r=-0.23~-0.51,P<0.01;r=-0.21~-0.49,P<0.01),YSR 量表中学习成绩也与多项因子得分呈负相关(r=-0.11~-0.28,P<0.01)。结论:建议在应用CBCL 父母评价量表和TRF 教师评价量表时,与YSR 青少年自评量表结合使用,能够更加全面地反映青少年的行为问题。 Objective: This study explores Achenbach's three famous checklists regarding to children's behavior problems: CBCL, YSR, TRF. The checklists are translated into Chinese and tested for their relativity and applicability. Methods: 1410 adolescents selected from 6 middle schools in Beijing are investigated with CBCL, YSR and TRF. Results: The Cronbach α among the items of the three checklists and the total score are 0.96, 0.95, and 0.99 respectively, the split-half reliability are 0.93, 0.89, and 0.97 respectively, which demonstrates an obvious homogeneity within the three checklists. Scores in YSR are generally higher than those of the other two checklists, scores in CBCL follow immediately, and scores in TRF are the lowest ( except for a minority of individual factors ). The scores in CBCL and YSR are significant correlated ( r=0.35 -0.60,P〈0.01 ). The scores in CBCL and TRF are correlated in concentration and aggressive behavior (r=0.13-0.25,P〈0.05). The study scores in CBCL and the respective sub-checklist factors are negatively correlated(r=-0.13 --0.39, P〈0.01), the adaptability and study scores in TRF are negatively correlated with respective sub-checklist factors(r=-0.23- -0.51, P〈0.01 ; r=-0.21 - -0.49, P〈0.01), the study scores in YSR are negatively correlated with several factors (r=-0. 1 1 --0.28, P〈0.01). Conclusion:When employing CBCL and TRF in behaviour problems, it is better to combine with the YSR so as to reflect the behavior problems of adolescents comprehensively.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第9期621-625,共5页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30370489)中国科学院重要方向性项目(KSCXZ-SW-211)
关键词 行为问题 心理测量学研究 中学生 behavior problems psychometric study middle school students
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献7

  • 1[2]Achenbach, T.M. Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 Profile. Burlington, TV: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry, 1991.
  • 2[3]Achenbach, T.M. Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist / 4 - 18 and 1 991 Profile. Burlington, TV: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry, 19 91.
  • 3[6]Sourander A, Helstela L, Helenius H. Parent-adolescent agreement on e m otional and behavioral problems. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 1999, 34(1 2): 657-663.
  • 4[7]Seiffge KI, Kollmar F. Discrepancies between mothers' and fathers' pe r ceptions of sons' and daughters' problem behaviour: a longitudinal analysis of p arent-adolescent agreement on internalising and externalising problem behaviour . J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 1998, 39(5): 687-697.
  • 5[8]Steinhausen HC, Dorr HG, Kannenberg R, et al. The behavior profile of children and adolescents with short stature, J Dev Behav Pediatr 2000, 21(6):423 -428.
  • 6[9]Rousseau C, Drapeau A. Parent-child agreement on refugee children's p s ychiatric symptoms: a transcultural perspective. J-Am-Acad-Child-Adolesc-Psychi atry, 1998, 37(6): 629-636.
  • 7刘贤臣,郭传琴,刘连启,王爱祯,胡蕾,唐茂芹,柴福勋,赵贵芳,杨杰,孙良民.Achenbach青少年行为自评量表的信度和效度研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1997,11(4):200-203. 被引量:58

共引文献579

同被引文献132

引证文献11

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部