期刊文献+

大豆花叶病毒(SMV)病显症率的模型预测 被引量:5

THE FORECASTING MODELS FOR THE RATE OF SYMPTOM APPEARANCE OF SOYBEAN MOSAIC VIRUS
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 大豆感染SMV系统量症前介体不能传毒。接种稀释10倍SMV病液显症率与介体传毒相似。介体和人工接种SMV于5个感病品种V_1-R_5 9个生长时期共30余批次,结果表明SMV显症率主要决定于温度。显症起始温度为9℃,最适温度约26℃.V_1-R_2时期的植株显症所需有效积温基本一致;R_3—R_5时期比前者略有增加。累积显症率与累积有效积温的相关点图呈“S”型曲线分布,通过Weibull和Gompertz等8组曲线拟合选出拟合最优模型。V_1—R_2时期显症预测Gompertz拟合最好,得预测式:PP_(11)=Exp[-103021.196×Exp(-0.1329TT_1)]R_3—R_5时期Weibull拟合最好,得预测式:PP_(12)=1-Exp{-[0.02222(TT_1-65)^(2.581)]} Soybean plants infected by SMV could become the acquisition hosts for the aphidsvectors,Only after appearance of systemic symptom.The rate of the syste- mic symptom appearance of soybean plants mechanically inoculated with the cru- de sap of 1:10 dilution was similar to that transmitted by aphid vectors.The soy-bean plants of V_1—R_5 growing stages of five susceptible cultivars were inocul-ated with the crude sap and by aphid vectors and the experiments were repeated more than 30 times,the results suggested the rate of the systemic symptom app- earance of infected plants was greatly correlated with the temperature.The mi-nimum temperature for the symptom appearance was 9℃,the optimal temperature was about 26℃.The effective accumulative temperature for the rate of symptom appearance of plants since infection by SMV during V_1—R_2 growing stages were very sim-ilar,but those during R_3—R_5 were little higher than that during V_1—R_2.The figures of correlation points between the data of accumulative rate of systemic symptom appearance and those of accumulative effective temperature showed sig- mold curve.Among 8 formulas used to describe the data,the Gompertz was the best suitable for that during V_1—R_2,the forecasting model is:PPi_1=Exp(-103021. 196 Exp(-0.1329TTi).and the Weibull was the during R_3—R_5,the forecasting model is:PPi_2=1—Exp[-(0.02222(TTi—65)^(2.581)].
出处 《植物病理学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1989年第2期87-93,共7页 Acta Phytopathologica Sinica
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1郭井泉,病毒学报,1988年
  • 2吕文清,植物病理学报,1985年,15卷,4期,225页
  • 3肖悦岩,中国科学.B,1985年,2期,151页
  • 4曾士迈,北京农业大学学报,1982年,7卷,3期,1页

同被引文献20

  • 1郭井泉,张明厚.大豆花叶病毒(SMV)主要介体及其传毒效率研究[J].大豆科学,1989,8(1):55-63. 被引量:19
  • 2钟兆西,王伟,张桂荣.大豆灰斑病菌(Cercospora sojina)生物学特性的研究[J].大豆科学,1989,8(3):288-294. 被引量:15
  • 3陈永萱,南京农业大学学报,1988年,11卷,1期,60页
  • 4张明厚,植物病理学报,1986年,16卷,3期,151页
  • 5管致和,植物保护学报,1963年,2卷,2期,163页
  • 6郭井泉,中国病毒学,1990年,1期,97页
  • 7曾士迈,系统科学在植物保护研究中的应用,1990年
  • 8张明厚,植物保护学报,1988年,15卷,4期,223页
  • 9吕文清,植物病理学报,1985年,15卷,4期,225页
  • 10钟兆西,中国植物病理学会论文摘要汇编,1989年

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部