期刊文献+

美国阅读教学改革所受质疑评析 被引量:9

Evaluation on the Criticism of American Reading Pedagogy Reform
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国低年级儿童阅读教学改革已进入第三年,其推广的阅读教学法实施效果不理想,受到了各方的质疑。民众批评该教学法:缺乏科学性,违背教学规律,有失公正,限制了教师及学校的活动空间。该阅读教学法过于"标准化"及教学改革的政治化倾向是其遭受指责的根本原因,民众对阅读教学的批评将导致美国新的阅读教学改革的产生。 The reform in the teaching of reading to the children at lower grades in American schools has entered into the third year. However the results of the extended teaching methods of reading are not satisfactory and it is under the various criticisms from the public. The criticism targets at that it is not scientific, contradictory to the conventional practice of school teaching, lacking justice, as well as constraining the flexibility of the activities of teachers and schools. Analyses show that the root of the blame comes from its over standardization of the teaching of reading and its political tendency. The current public criticism will lead to another round of reform in reading pedagogy in American schools.
作者 魏宏聚
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第11期67-70,共4页 International and Comparative Education
关键词 美国 教学法 改革 质疑 America pedagogy reform criticism
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1.[EB/OL].http: //www. ed. gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html,.
  • 2洪成文.美国中小学阅读和数学课的历史发展及趋势[J].比较教育研究,2001,22(10):18-22. 被引量:3
  • 3Michacl Cardman. State K - 12 Systems Come Up Short In New Analysis[N]. Education Daily. Washington: Feb 13,2004, 37(29).
  • 4Catherine Snow. Reading for Undemanding: Toward an R & D Program in Reading Comprehension, September2002, www. rand. org/edu - area.
  • 5Jacqueline Edmondson. Reading policies: ideologies and strategies for political engagement[J] . The Reading Teacher. Newark: Feb 2004,57(5).
  • 6Joanne Yativin. constance weaver, Elaine garan. Reading first: Cautions and recommendations[J] .language Arts. Urbana: Sep 2003, 81 ( 1 ).
  • 7Jerry Zimmermann&. Carolyn Brown. Let them eat more than phonics [J] . Phi Delta Kappan. Bloomington: Apr 2003, 84(8).
  • 8Linda Jacobson. Parent Poll Scrutinizes No Child Left Behind Act[J]. Education Week. Washington: Feb2004,23 (23).
  • 9Stevens. Reading first[J]. The Reading Teacher.Newwark: Apr 2003,56(7).

二级参考文献7

  • 1Chall,J.,The new reading debates:Evidence from science,art,and ideology[J].Teachers College Record,1992,94.Winter.
  • 2Chall,J.,The new reading debates:Evidence from science,art,and ideology[J].Teachers College Record,1992,94.Winter.
  • 3Magaet Moustafa(2001).Contemporary reading construction,In Loveless[A].T.(ed).Curriculum Wars:Alternative approachesto reading and mathematics[C].Washington,D.C.:The Brookings Institution.
  • 4Burdl Gall(2001).Mathematics education:The future and the past create a context for today's issues,In Loveless[A].T.(ed).Curriculum Wars:Alternative approachesto reading and mathematics[C].Washington,D.C.:The Brookings Institution.
  • 5T.Loveless(1988).Curriculum Wars:Alternative approach to reading and mathematics[M].Washington,DC,the Brookings Institution.
  • 6Douglas E.Mitchel & William L.Boyd.Curriculum Politics in Global Perspective[J].Education Policy,2001,15(1).
  • 7Daves,S.& Guppy,N.,Globalization and educational reform in Anglo-American democracies[J].Comparative Education Review,1997,41(4).

同被引文献51

引证文献9

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部