期刊文献+

运用CVM对生态保护经济价值的评价——在武陵源国家自然保护区中的应用分析 被引量:5

Evaluation of the Economic Value of the Protection of Ecological Environment by Applying CVM
原文传递
导出
摘要 运用CVM投标博弈法的支付卡问卷方式.对武陵源国家自然保护区生态保护经济价值进行评价。评价结果是:WTP平均值为55.04元/人.WAC平均值为202.35元/人,WAC与WTP的比值为3.68;每年的总经济价值分别为:WTP为33024万元,WAC为121410万元。评价结果表明,虽支付意愿和赔偿意愿会受到样本中不同经济收入人群、假想偏差、把环境变化作为收益还是作为损失、样本大小等因素的影响,但它验证了在我国开展CVM对环境物品评价的可行性。 The paper mainly analyses the evaluation of the economic value of the protection of ecological environment in Wu-Ling-Yuan National Natural Protected Area by applying the Payment Card of the Bidding Game Approach in CVM. The results: WTP is $$$$$$$$55.04 per capita, WAC is $$$$$$$$202.35 per capita, WAC / WTP is 3.68; the general economic value per year is respectively $$$$$$$$3302.4 million and $$$$$$$$1.2141 billion according to the WTP and WAC. The survey shows that the results of WTP and WAC can be influenced by people with different incomes, hypothetical point bias, taking it as income or loss, the size of a sample and so on, but they prove that CVM is available to be applied in evaluating the value of environment in our country.
作者 刘亚萍
出处 《绿色中国(理论版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第11M期34-37,共4页 Green China
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1张嘉宾.森林生态经济[M].昆明:云南人民出版社,1986.176—187.
  • 2赵军,杨凯.上海城市内河生态系统服务的条件价值评估[J].环境科学研究,2004,17(2):49-52. 被引量:41
  • 3Hanemann M. Preface. In Pricing the European Environment, ed. S Navrud, pp. 9-35. Oxford Univ. Press,1992.
  • 4Loomis J, Kent P, Strange L, et al. Measuring the economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey [J]. Ecological Economics,2000,33:103-117.
  • 5Amigues J p, Bloulatoff C, Desigues B, et al. The benefits and costs of riparian analysis habitat preservation: a willingness to acceptwillingness to pay using contingent valuation approach [J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 43:17-31.

二级参考文献17

  • 1上海市浦东新区史志编纂委员会.2002年浦东年鉴[M].上海:浦东年鉴社,2002.257-286.
  • 2Costanza R,d'Arge R,de-Groot R,et al.The value of the worlds ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nat,1997,386(6630):253-260.?A
  • 3Choi W S,Lee K J,Lee B W. Determining the value of reductions in radiation risk using the contingent valuation method[J].Annals of Nuclear Energy,2001,28:1431-1445.
  • 4Loomis J,Kent P,Strange L,et al.Measuring the economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin:results from a contingent valuation survey[J].Ecological Economics,2000,33:103-117.?A
  • 5Amigues J P, Boulatoff C,Desigues B,et al.The benefits and costs of riparian analysis habitat preservation:a willingness to accept/willingness to pay using contingent valuation approach[J]. Ecological Economics,2002,43:17-31.
  • 6Jones-Lee M W, Hammerton H, Philips P. The value of safety: Results of a national sample survey[J]. Economic Journal, 1985, 95: 49-72.?A
  • 7Gyldmark M, Gwendolyn M C. Demand for health care in Denmark: results of a national sample survey using contingent valuation [J]. Social Science & Medicine, 2001, 53: 1023-1036.?A
  • 8Zarkin A G, Cates S C, Bala M V. Estimating the willingness to pay for drug abuse treatment-a pilot study[J]. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2000, 18: 149-159.?A
  • 9National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation[J]. Federal Register, 1993, 58(10): 4601-4614.?A
  • 10Bateman I J, Langford I H, Turner R T, et al. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies[J]. Ecological Economics, 1995, 12: 161-179.

共引文献40

同被引文献65

引证文献5

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部