期刊文献+

宝天高速公路沿线保护生态环境总经济价值评估 被引量:13

Assessment of Total Economic Value of Preserving the Ecological Environment of Baotian Highway
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 条件价值评估法是当前国际上流行的衡量环境物品非利用经济价值的唯一方法。通过调查居民针对不同环境状况变化的支付意愿,从而定量确定环境状况变化带来的经济效益和损失。针对宝天高速公路修建过程中沿线保护生态环境的问题,用支付卡的方法设计了320份调查问卷,调查了沿线居民对保护宝天高速公路沿线生态环境的支付意愿(WTP)。结果表明:在宝天高速公路修路过程中采取各种技术措施,使沿线的生态环境尽可能保持原样,沿线总共有84.33%的居民家庭有支付意愿,有支付意愿家庭的平均支付意愿为每年每户62.17元,将这一结果推广到面上,得到保护宝天高速公路沿线生态环境的总经济价值为:5781 756元。 The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) is a direct interview approach that can be used to provide acceptable measures of the economic value of recreation opportunities as well as preservation of natural resources. This latter use is unique to contingent valuation. Contingent valuation methods use simulated (hypothetical) markets to identify values similar to actual markets. In th is paper, the authors take it as a tool to assess the total economic value of protecting the ecological environment along the Baotian highway. Through the way o f Payment Card we designed 320 questionnaires to investigate the households' willing to pay for the project which about preserving the ecological environment a long the highway of Baotian. The results indicates that: during the period of bu ilding the Baotian highway, some measures should be taken to maintain the ecological environment what it is 84.33% of the households would like to pay for the protection of the environment. Analysis of the payment card data shows that willi ngness to pay (WTP) for the project is 62.17RMB Yuan per household per year and the total economic value for preservation of the ecological environment along the high way of Baotian is 5781756 RMB Yuan.
出处 《干旱区地理》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期878-884,共7页 Arid Land Geography
基金 交通部西部通建设科技项目(2004-318-000-57) 西北师范大学青年教师科研基金(NWNU-QN-04-34) 西北师范大学自然地理学省级重点学科资助
关键词 条件估值法 支付意愿 保护生态环境 总经济价值 宝天高速公路 Contingent valuation method (CVM) Willingness to pay (WTP) Preserving the ecological environment Total economic value Highway of Baotian
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估[J].生态学报,2001,21(11):1918-1926. 被引量:330
  • 2Davis R K.Recreation planning as an economic problem[J].Natural Resourc es Journal,1963,3:239-249.
  • 3Loomis J B,Walsh R G.Recreation Economic Decisions,Comparing Benefits an d Costs (second edition)[M].Pennsylvania:Venture Publishing,Inc,1997.195-176
  • 4Hanemann W M,Kanninen B.The statistical analysis of discreteresponse CV data[R].Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,University of Califo rnia at Berkeley.Working Paper No.798,1996.1 -96.
  • 5Anthony F,Krutilla J.Determination of optimal capacity of resource base d recreation facilities[J].Natural Resources Journal,1972,(12):417 -444.
  • 6Randall A,Ives B,Eastman C.Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,197 4,1:132-149.
  • 7Loomis J B.Contingent valuation methodology and the US institutional fram ework[A].In:Bateman I J,Willis K G,eds.Valuing Environmental Preferences:Theo ry and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US,EU and Developing Countries.New York:Oxford University Press,1999.613-627.
  • 8Mitchell D C,Carson R T.Using Surveys to Value Public Good:The Contingent Valuation Method[M].Washington DC:Resources for the Future,1989.85-102
  • 9Arrow K,Solow R,Portney P,et al.Report of the NOAA panel on contingent va luation.Report to the General Council of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration[R].Washington DC:Resources for the Future,1993,58 (10):4620-4614
  • 10Bateman I J,Langford I H,Turner R K,et al.Elicitation and truncati on effects in contingent valuation studies[J].Ecological Economics,1999,12:161-179.

二级参考文献170

共引文献988

同被引文献179

引证文献13

二级引证文献131

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部