期刊文献+

主题信息合理性、语境意义偏向性对汉语歧义句意义建构的影响 被引量:4

The Effect of Thematic Information, Context Meaning Frequency on Resolving the Ambiguity Sentences in Chinese
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 两个实验以合理型主题信息条件下的句子为对照材料 ,其它型主题信息条件下的句子为实验材料 ,考察合理型和非合理型主题信息条件下汉语歧义句意义建构的时间进程和特点。结果表明 :(1 )合理型主题信息可以顺利地建构一个稳定的基础心理表征 ;不合理型主题信息则没有这种效应 ;矛盾型主题信息则引导读者重构一个新的心理表征。 (2 )在合理型主题信息条件下 ,语境主要起到证实主题信息区和歧义区所建构的基础表征的作用 ;而在不合理型、矛盾型主题信息的条件下 ,语境的作用首先是验证所建构的基础心理表征和歧义句的意义频率 。 Two experiments were conducted to investigate how ambiguity sentences constructed their mental representation and structure in Chinese. The result showed the reasonable thematic information could construct a stable basic mental representation while unreasonable thematic information could not. Contradictory thematic information caused readers to reconstruct a new mental representation. Under the condition of reasonable thematic information, context mainly served to verify the meaning frequency of ambiguous sentences, but under the condition of unreasonable and contradictory thematic information, context first served to testify the basic mental representation and the meaning frequency of ambiguous sentences, then to resolve ambiguous sentences.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第4期855-858,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 汉语 歧义句 语境意义 主题信息 thematic information, context meaning frequency, syntactic ambiguity, meaning construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献28

  • 1陈永明,崔耀.汉语歧义句的加工[J].心理学报,1997,29(1):2-8. 被引量:23
  • 2崔耀,陈永明.阅读理解中的预期推理[J].心理学报,1996,28(3):238-244. 被引量:32
  • 3冯志伟.自然语言处理中的歧义消解方法[J].语言文字应用,1996(1):55-60. 被引量:25
  • 4彭聃龄,刘松林.汉语句子理解中语义分析与句法分析的关系[J].心理学报,1993,25(2):132-139. 被引量:19
  • 5[1]Frazier L, Rayner K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 1982,14:178-210
  • 6[2]Frazier L. On comprehension sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1978
  • 7[3]Frazier L, Fodor J D. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 1978, 6:291-326
  • 8[4]Rayner K, Carlson M, Frazier L. The interaction of syntactic and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movement in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1983, 22:358-374
  • 9[5]Rayner K, Garrod S, Perfetti C A. Discourse influences during parsing are delayed. Cognition, 1992, 45:109-139
  • 10[6]Taraban R, McCelland J L. Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expections. Journal of Memory and Language, 1988, 27:597-632

共引文献56

同被引文献53

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部