摘要
目的 :解决持续腰池引流治疗蛛网膜下腔出血 (SAH)的引流管堵塞问题。方法 :对 16 8例SAH患者分别采用深静脉穿刺管 (试验组 )与持续硬外麻醉管 (对照组 )进行持续腰池引流治疗 ,将堵管率作对比。结果 :堵塞率试验组为 2 38% ,对照组为 15 4 8%。结论 :持续腰池引流治疗SAH ,深静脉管穿刺管明显优于持续硬膜外麻醉管。
Objective:To solve the problem of tube obstruction in continious cerebrespinal fluid drainage.Method:The continious cerebrespinal fluid drainage was performed in 168 cases,in which 84 cases by deep vein cathether,and 84 by epidura aneathesia tube.Results:The ratio of drainage tube obstruction in the study group was 2.38%,that in the contrast group was 15.48%.Conclusion:Deep vein cathether was superior to epidura anaesthesia tube in continious cerebrespinal fluid drainage treatment of SAH.
出处
《华西医学》
CAS
2004年第2期192-193,共2页
West China Medical Journal
关键词
持续腰池引流
治疗
SAH
引流管堵塞
蛛网膜下腔出血
Continious cerebrespinal fluid drainage
Deep vein cathether
Epidura anaesthesia tube
