摘要
对CSSCI数据库内中国主流法学引证情况的统计分析表明 ,从 1998年到 2 0 0 1年 ,中国主流法学界的引证呈现出“权威引证”严重、“自我引证”增加、一些学科的引证主要集中于知识结构相对陈旧的老一代学人、北京学者的引证不成比例地奇高等特点 ,并且可能大量存在“该引的不引”和“引的不该引”的情况。这些特点和情况既为引证评价机制应用于中国法学的学术研究评价和学术行政管理设置了障碍 ,也给出了完善引证评价机制所需努力的方向。
The statistical analysis of citations in China's dominant legal scholarship through CSSIC database during 1998 and 2001 shows some significant tendencies. There are excessive “authority citations' and more “self citations.' In some disciplines, citations mainly focus older scholars. In addition, the level of citations from researchers in Beijing is unproportionately high. Besides, while documentation is made where it is unnecessary, yet is left over where it is required. These facts hinder the application of citation evaluation to legal studies and university management, and point to the direction to which efforts should be made.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第3期97-107,共11页
Social Sciences in China
