期刊文献+

社区与住院精神分裂症患者生活质量的比较分析 被引量:10

Comparative study of quality of life between community and inpatients with schizophrenia
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 对社区康复期与住院精神分裂症患者的生活质量进行了调查和比较分析。方法 用健康调查表SF - 36调查社区康复期与住院精神分裂症患者 ,并设正常对照组。结果 正常对照组的SF - 36因子分体能(PF)、体能影响 (RP)、一般健康 (GH)、社会活动 (SF)、心理健康 (MH)均高于社区康复期精神分裂症患者 ,差异有极显著性 (P <0 0 1) ;正常对照组在体能 (PF)、体能影响 (RP)、社会活动 (SF)因子分均高于住院治疗期精神分裂症患者 ,差异有极显著性 (P <0 0 1) ;社区康复期精神分裂症患者在体能 (PF)、体能影响 (RP)、精神影响 (RE)分高于住院治疗期精神分裂症患者 ,且差异有极显著性 (P <0 0 1) ,而后者一般健康 (GH)、精力 (VT)、心理健康 (MH)分高于前者 ,且差异有显著性 (P <0 0 5 )。结论 社区康复期精神分裂症患者在躯体健康方面优于住院治疗期精神分裂症患者 ,后者在精神健康方面优于社区康复期精神分裂症患者。 Objective To comparative study of quality of life between community and in-patients with schizophrenia.Methods The community and in-patients with schizophrenia were investigated by using the SF-36,who compared with normal control group.Results The control group’s physical functioning and role-physica and general health and social functioning and mental health signiticantly higher than community recovery with schizophrenia( P <0.01).The control group’s physical functioning and role-physical and social functioning signiticantly higher than in-patients with schizophrenia( P <0.01).Community recovery with schizophrenia’s physical functioning and role-physical and role-emotional signiticantly higher than inpatients with schizophrenia( P <0.01),that general health and vitality and mental health were poorer than in-patients with schizophrenia( P <0.05).Conclusion Community with schizophrenia has fewer side physical health than in-patients with schizophrenia,that mental health were poorer than in-patients with schizophrenia.
出处 《四川精神卫生》 2004年第2期82-83,共2页 Sichuan Mental Health
关键词 健康调查表 精神分裂症患者 生活质量 SE-36 Schizophrenia Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

  • 1于普林,吴雅凤,赵兵利,郑国珍,宋晓光,张培兰,何慧德.老年离退休职工生活质量调查分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,1996,15(6):370-371. 被引量:40
  • 2王爱萍 邹华伟 等.SF-36对三类病人健康状况测量结果的分析[J].国际中华身心医学杂志,1999,1(1):44-45.
  • 3Ware JE. SF - 36 Health Survey. Marmual and Interpretation Guide. Boston. MA: The Health Institute, 1993 .
  • 4Gandek B, Ware JE Jr, Aaronson NK, et al. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF - 36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998 , 51 (11) : 1149 -1158.
  • 5Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF - 36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Elaidemiol, 1998, 51 (11): 903- 912.
  • 6Sanson - Fisher RW, Perkins JJ. Adaptation and validation of the SF- 36 Health Survey for use in Australia. J Clin Epidemiol,1998, 51 (11): 961-967.
  • 7Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr. The Swedish SF- 36 Health Survey - - I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden.Soc Sci Med. 1995, 41 (10): 349-358.
  • 8Shmueli A. The SF - 36 profde and health - related quality of life :an interpretative analysis. Qual Life Res, 1998, 7 (3): 187-195.
  • 9王爱萍,国际中华心身医学杂志,1999年,1卷,1期,44页
  • 10Ren X S,J Clin Epidemiol,1998年,51卷,1期,1129页

共引文献339

同被引文献127

引证文献10

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部