期刊文献+

APACHE II及MODS评分预测ICU危重症患者预后的价值 被引量:6

Comparison between Prognostic Values of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score on Patients in ICU
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 :比较急性生理与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ )与多器官功能障碍评分 (MODS)对ICU患者预后价值。方法:记录104例机械通气超过48h患者入院时的APACHEⅡ、MODS评分及住院时间与转归。结果:存活组与死亡组MODS分值差别有统计学意义(P<0.01) ,MODS评分分值越高病死率越高,APACHEⅡ评分无此趋势。用COX比例风险模型分析2组间APACHEⅡ及MODS评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01) ,对预后价值最大的6个器官功能障碍变量依次为 :神经系统、心血管、血液、肾脏、肝脏及呼吸系统。结论:APACHEⅡ及MODS评分对ICU患者预后均有价值 ,若评价住院期间病死率 。 Objective:To compare the prognostic values of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II(APACHE II)and multiple organ dysfunction score(MODS)on patients in ICU.Methods:The APACHE II and MODS scores,hospitalization duration and mortality were measured in 104 patients who were mechanically ventilated for >48 hours.Results:There was a significant difference of MODS between survivors and non-survivors groups(P<0.01).The mortality increased along with the elevation of MODS,but the equivalent trend for APACHE II was not found.When COX regression models were used,there was a significant difference of APACHE II and MODS between the two groups(P<0.01).Accoding to the prognostic values,the six MODS components were arranged as follows:central nervous,cardiovascular,hematologic,renal,hepatic and respiratory systems.Conclusion:Both APACHE II and MODS scores can be used to predict the outcomes of critically ill patients in ICU.The MODS may provide the additional prognostic value over the APACHE II socre when the mortality during hospitalization is analyzed.
出处 《天津医药》 CAS 北大核心 2004年第3期149-151,共3页 Tianjin Medical Journal
关键词 APACHEⅡ MODS评分 预测 ICU 危重症 预后 多器官功能衰竭 multiple organ failure prognosis respiration,artificial
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al.APACHE Ⅱ : a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med, 1985, 13 : 818 - 829.
  • 22 Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou N, et al. Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outlcome. Crit Care Med, 1995.23: 1638- 1652.
  • 3Jacobs S, Zulekia M, Mphansa T. The multiple organ dysfunction score as a descriptor of patient outcome in septic shock compared with two other scoring systems. Crit Care Med,1999, 27:741 - 744.
  • 4Cook R, Cook D, Tilley J, et al. Multiple organ dysfunction:baseline and serial component scores. Crit Care Med, 2001, 29:2046- 2050.
  • 5邱海波,周韶霞,杨毅,黄英姿,郑瑞强.多器官功能障碍综合征的死亡危险因素分析及临床对策[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2001,10(1):13-16. 被引量:146

二级参考文献1

共引文献145

同被引文献60

引证文献6

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部