摘要
目的分析临床麻醉学临床治疗随机对照试验 (randomizedcontrolledtrial ,RCT)论文的方法学质量。方法人工检索 1999~ 2 0 0 3年 9月《临床麻醉学杂志》、《中华麻醉学杂志》和《中国疼痛医学杂志》发表的临床治疗研究论文 ,根据Cochrane中心手检指南严格鉴定其中的RCT。结果 1999~ 2 0 0 3年 9月《临床麻醉学杂志》、《中华麻醉学杂志》和《中国疼痛医学杂志》分别登载临床治疗研究论文为 4 12篇、378篇和14 2篇 ,其中RCT分别为 2 37篇 (5 7.5 2 % )、2 2 1篇 (5 8.4 7% )和 6 8篇 (4 7.89% )。结论临床麻醉学临床治疗RCTs数逐年增加 ,但质量仍有待提高。
Objective To evaluate the c u rrent situation of the design of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Clinical Anesthesiology, Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology and Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine from 1999 to Septem ber in 2003 . Methods The clinical therapeutic studies in the three journals from 1999 to September of 2003 were hand searched over pa ge by page to identify strictly the randomized controlled trials according to Ch inese Cochrane Center hand search guideline. Result 412 , 378 and 142 papers of the three journals were published, among which, there we re 237, 221 and 68 papers of RCT. Conclusion Although the quality of RCT in the three journals has been increased significantly year b y year, but there still exist some problems. The quality of RCT papers needs mor e improvement to guarantee RCT to be more precise as it demands.
出处
《中国循证医学杂志》
CSCD
2004年第2期114-115,75,共3页
Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词
麻醉学
随机对照试验
试验方法
RCT
公共卫生
Clinical Anesthesiology
Randomized con trolled trial
Quality evaluation