摘要
本文对比观察咪达唑仑和硫喷妥钠用于全麻诱导各20例的效果,表明前者诱导时间比后者慢(P<0.01),但对循环和呼吸系统的影响较轻(P<0.01)。2药均可获得满意的插管条件,由于咪达唑仑的作用确切而和缓,更适用于硫喷妥钠有顾虑的病人。
The effects of midazolam and thiopental sodium for induction in anesthesia were closely compared on 20 patients in each. The time required for induction in midazolam was definitely slower than that of thiopental sodium (P<0.01) while the influences to circulation and respiration were milder in midazolam as compared with those obtained from thiopental sodium (P<0.01). It is concluded that mids azolam given intravenously may produce a smooth and definite anesthesia and may serve as an induction agent especially for those patients unsuitable for thiopental sodium.
出处
《新药与临床》
CSCD
北大核心
1992年第3期136-138,共3页
关键词
咪达唑仑
硫喷妥
麻醉
midazolam/therapeutic use
thiopental/therapeutic use
intravenous anesthesia
