期刊文献+

老年人脉压指数与颈动脉内膜中层厚度的关系 被引量:43

The Relationship Between Pulse Pressure Index and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Elderly Patients
暂未订购
导出
摘要 为了研究脉压指数与颈动脉内膜中层厚度的关系 ,对 334例老年人行颈动脉内膜中层厚度超声检测并进行测压 ,分别以脉压≤ 6 0mmHg、6 1~ 80mmHg、81~ 10 0mmHg及 >10 0mmHg和脉压指数≤ 0 .4 0 0、0 .4 0 1~ 0 .5 0 0、0 .5 0 1~ 0 .6 0 0及 >0 .6 0 0分为四个亚组进行分析。结果发现 ,随着脉压和脉压指数的增加 ,颈动脉内膜中层厚度和收缩压均随之增加 ,脉压指数组舒张压进行性下降 ;Spearman’s相关分析发现 ,颈动脉内膜中层厚度与脉压指数相关性最佳 ;多元逐步回归分析显示 ,颈动脉内膜中层厚度仅与脉压指数、年龄具有显著回归效果 ,脉压指数的标准回归系数远大于年龄。结果提示 。 Aim To investigate the relationship between pulse pressure index (PPI) and carotid intima media thickness (IMT). Methods A total of 334 elderly patients were divided into 4 subgroups according to the level of pulse pressure (≤60 mmHg, 61~80 mmHg, 81~100 mmHg, >100 mmHg) and PPI (≤0.400, 0.401~0.500, 0.501~0.600, >0.600) respectively. Parameters of blood pressure, clinical features and carotid IMT were analyzed. Results The carotid IMT, systolic blood pressure, and age all increased when pulse pressure and PPI increased. However, diastolic blood pressure decreased with PPI increasing, but not when pulse pressure increased. The carotid IMT correlated best with PPI in Spearman's correlation analysis. The multiple factor stepwise regression analysis showed that only the regression of carotid IMT with PPI and age were of great significance, and the standard regression coefficiency of PPI was higher than age. Conclusion The PPI is better than pulse pressure in evaluating sclerosis of vessels in elderly patients.
出处 《中国动脉硬化杂志》 CAS CSCD 2003年第3期250-253,共4页 Chinese Journal of Arteriosclerosis
关键词 老年人 脉压指数 评价 血管硬化 超声检测 颈动脉内膜中层厚度 动脉硬化 Carotid Intima Media Thickness Pulse Pressure Arteriosclerosis Systolic Blood Pressure Pulse Pressure Index
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[1]Bots ML, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Increased common carotid intima-media thickness: adaptive response or a reflection of atherosclerosis? Findings from the Rotterdam Study. Stroke, 1997, 28 (12): 2 442-447
  • 2[2]Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation, 1997, 96 (5): 1 432-437
  • 3[3]Zureik M, Touboul PJ, Bonithon-Kopp C, Courbon D, Berr C, Leroux C, et al. Cross-sectional and 4-year longitudinal associations between brachial pulse pressure and common carotid intima-media thickness in a general population: the EVA Study. Stroke, 1999, 30 (3): 550-555
  • 4[4]Riley WA, Evans GW, Sharrett AR, Burke GL, Barnes RW. Variation of common carotid artery elasticity with intimal-thickness: the ARIC Study. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1997, 23 (2): 157-164
  • 5杨鹏麟,徐定修,张素勤.脉压指数评价血管硬化的可行性探讨[J].中华心血管病杂志,2002,30(6):334-337. 被引量:203
  • 6苏琳,苗懿德,孙宁玲,周惠清,张万蕾.老年高血压患者颈动脉内膜中层厚度及血管内皮依赖性舒张功能[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2001,9(1):53-56. 被引量:40
  • 7[7]Benetos A, Safar M, Rudnichi A, Smulyan H, Richard JL, Ducimetieere P, et al. Pulse pressure: a predictor of long-term cardiovascular mortality in a French male population. Hypertension, 1997, 30 (6): 1 410-415
  • 8[8]Safar ME, Girerd X, Laurent S. Structural changes of large conduit arteries in hypertension. J Hypertens, 1996, 14 (5): 545-555
  • 9[9]London GM, Safar ME. Arterial wall remodelling and stiffness in hypertension: heterogeneous aspects. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 1996, 23 (8):S1-S5
  • 10[10]Van Popele NM, Grobbee DE, Bots ML, Asmar R, Topouchian J, Reneman RS, et al. Association between arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis: the Rotterdam Study. Stroke, 2001, 32 (2): 454-460

二级参考文献2

共引文献240

同被引文献348

引证文献43

二级引证文献391

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部