摘要
证明标准是诉讼证明的最基本问题 ,也是当前我国证据法学领域研讨十分热烈的问题。这场学术论战的中心在于诉讼证明活动中应当坚持“客观真实”标准 ,还是应当坚持“法律真实”标准 ;其中最具争议的焦点是刑事诉讼的证明标准。比较而言 ,“法律真实”证明标准在理论上更具严密性 ,在实践中更具优越性 ,在体系上更具包容性。融合“客观真实”说合理内核后的“法律真实”标准 ,应当成为整个诉讼证明活动的统帅。
Witness standard is the most basic element of procedural witness, and it is an extremely hot issue being discussed in current data science of law field as well. The core of this academic combat lies at that the activities of procedural witness should insist on either the standard of “objective truth”or the standard of “legal truth”, among which the most conflictive focus is that of the procedural witness standard. Comparatively, “legal truth” witness standard is more precise in theory, more advantageous in practice and more comprehensive in system. Therefore, the procedural witness standard of “legal truth” combining with inner core of “objective truth”should be regarded as the leading standard for the whole procedural witness activities.
