期刊文献+

试论伊拉克战争后联合国的作用和前途 被引量:5

On the UK's Role and Its Future After the Iraqi War
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 美英对伊拉克战争虽已结束,但这场战争影响深远。此次战争纯系美国单边主义行动,反映到联合国内,是一场罕见的单边主义与多边主义激烈而尖锐的较量。这种较量会此起彼伏地长期进行下去。联合国需要改革,但不可取代,其作用涵盖政治、维和、经济、军控、环保、文化等多种层面。西方有人鼓吹用“志愿联盟”来取代之,遭到联合国大多数会员国的坚决反对。美国不愿也不敢脱离联合国。要从历史长河及发展观点,全面审视联合国的作用和影响。 Though the Iraqi War launched by the US and Britain has come to an end, it's impact will run deep and great. The above War indicates nothing but an unilateral action of the US. The struggle between unilateralism and multilateralism at the UN on the War in Iraq becomes very sharp and deep. Such kind of struggle will keep on in the years to come. The UN needs reform but can't be replaced. The UN always plays and will play an important role in politics, Peace-keeping operations, economy, arms control, environment and culture, etc. Surely, the UN should not be replaced by the so-called coalition of the willing' from the West. It is strongly opposed by the most member States of the UN. At the same time, the US is unwilling and will not dare to withdraw from the UN. The UN's role and its influence have to be evaluated from the long historical point of views.
作者 钱文荣
出处 《国际问题研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第4期12-17,共6页 International Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1William Pfaff:"The UN may check U.S.power,"International Herald Tribune,March 11,2003.
  • 2罗伯特·佩普:"软制衡时代",《波士顿环球报》,2003年3月23日.
  • 3"法国不是一个反战主义者"[J].时代,2003,.
  • 4William Safire,"No,the U.N.is paralyzed,as usual," International Herald Tribune,March 11,2003.
  • 5"Au Revoir,Security Council," the editorial of The Wall Street Journal,March 21,2003.
  • 6《美国国家战略安全报告》,2002年10月29日.
  • 7"Why the Security Council Faild," by Michael J.Glennon,Foreign Affairs,May-June,2003.
  • 8《在美华人的信教:移民帮助重燃美国的基督教》.《华盛顿邮报》,2003年1月11日.
  • 9.[N].《纽约时报》,2003年5月18日.
  • 10Boutros Bortros-Ghali:"The Future of the United Nations",Financial Times,April 3,2003.

同被引文献54

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部