摘要
世界两大公证体系的差别 ,实质上是不同国家对于公证制度功能预期的差异。学习、借鉴国外的经验 ,必须从我国的政治、经济社会制度和公证制度的现实基础出发 ,革除现行以大陆法系的独立、专职的强势公证组织形式与英美法系的弱势公证职能相搭配的体制弊端 ,通过公证立法 ,强化公证职能与法律效力 ,以实现其与强势公证组织形式的内在机制平衡和功能协调 ,赋予并完善我国公证制度在经济与社会生活中的适度干预功能。
The difference between the two notarization systems in the Continental legal system and the Anglo-American legal system, is actually different country's different expectations to the institution of notarization. To learn and use foreign experiences for reference, we must start from the reality base of our country's present political and economic social system. We should strengthen the notarization function and its legal effect, by the way of legislation of notarization, to change the current institutional malpractice of combining 'mighty organizational form of notarization' in the Continental legal system, with 'weak function of notarization' in the Anglo-American legal system. Only when the function has been strengthened, could it become coordinated and reach equilibrium with the'mighty organizational form of notarization', assuming and performing the work of'moderately intervention' in economic and social life.
出处
《法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第5期51-57,共7页
Chinese Journal of Law
