期刊文献+

ODR:解决电子商务争议的新模式 被引量:85

ODR:解决电子商务争议的新模式
原文传递
导出
摘要 电子商务的飞速发展 ,引起了大量的跨国或跨地区的民商事纠纷。由于网络环境极大地改变了交易的方式 ,使原有的争议解决模式在新形式下遇到诸多困难。为了适应实践的需要 ,欧美国家兴起了一种替代性的“在线纠纷解决机制” ,简称ODR (OnlineDisputeResolution)。文章第一部分提出并分析问题 ,介绍了作为电子商务基础的电子合同的一些特点 ,以及其所导致的跨国电子商务争议解决模式下遭遇的困境 ;第二部分为对策 ,集中介绍和分析了全球ODR的发展概况、两种主要模式、利用ODR解决争议所具有的优势以及ODR所面临的法律问题 ;第三部分为结论 ,分析了我国发展ODR的必要性及存在的问题 。 With the rapid development of E-commerce, more transnational and trans-regional transactions have been occurring in the world, which arose a number of civil and commercial disputes involving different nations and regions whose law varies. In order to meet the demands of the practice, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) has arisen in American and European countries. This article can be divided into three parts: in the first part, the authors introduce some characteristics of E-contract and analyze the difficulties of E-commerce dispute resolution under litigation.Then the authors put forward a new dispute resolution mechanism-ODR aimed at resolving E-commerce dispute specifically, in this part, the general situation of ODR development in this planet and two main patterns of ODR are introduced, and the benefits and concerns of ODR are also analyzed; finally, the authors suggest that China establish and develop ODR as soon as possible in spite the legal obstacles in present China law.
出处 《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第6期146-157,共12页 China Legal Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1联合国贸易发展委员会.《电子商务示范法》第15条的规定.
  • 2消永平.《肖永平论冲突法》,武汉大学出版社,2002年版,第429页.
  • 3韩德培主编.《国际私法新论》,武汉大学出版社,1996年版,第671页.
  • 4Clicknsettel. corn website available at http://www, clicknsettel.com (last visited sept 22,2002).
  • 5Squaretrade.com website available at http://www, squaretrade.com (last visited sept 24,2002).
  • 6http:// www . squartrade . eom/odr/jsp.
  • 7see Amazon.com website, available at http://www.amazon, com/exec/obidos/subst/misc/policy(last visited Sept 24,2002).
  • 8Joseph A. Zavaletta, J.D ,Using a E- dispute Technology to Facilitate the Resolution of E - contract Disputes: a Modest Proposal , University of Florida Journal of Technology Law and Policy, Volume 7,June 2002,No.1.pp. 14- 16.
  • 9see Article IV, Section 1 of the US. Constitution.
  • 10陶景洲.略论网上仲裁[J].法学,2000,(12).

共引文献6

同被引文献559

引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部