期刊文献+

自然语言与逻辑语言:人脑与电脑 被引量:2

Natural Language and Logical Language: Human Brain and Computer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 与自然语言相对的是逻辑语言.自然语言是人脑与人脑的交际工具,逻辑语言是人脑与电脑的交际工具.认知科学认为,思维和认知是知识的逻辑运算,任何计算化的自然语言分析都主要依赖逻辑语言对这种分析的表述.研究心智表现及其运算的认知科学理论追求的是心智研究的物质体现,这最终将导致语言学研究进入自然科学研究.自然语言的高度形式化描写对计算机程序的机械模仿至关重要,但理解力模仿不同于机械模仿,它们之间的区别非常类似自然语言中形式操作与意义操作之间的不同.机械模仿涉及的是形式性质,而理解力模仿涉及的却是准语义性质.现阶段计算机以机械模仿为主并通过逻辑语言与人类的自然语言对话. Logic language is opposite to natural language. Natural language is the means by which people communicate with each other while logic language is the means by which people communicate with computer. According to cognitive science, cognition is logical operation of knowledge while thinking is computation. Any computerized analysis of natural language mainly depends on the expression of the logic language. What it is seeking for the theory of cognitive science studying on the expression of the mind and computation is the physical reflection on mind study. This will eventually lead linguistic research to natural science study. The highly formative description of natural language is of vital importance to mechanical simulation of computer programme. Man's comprehenstion is quite different from mechanical simulation. The difference is quite similar to the one between form and meaning operations in natural language. Mechanical simulation deals with something formulated while comprehensive simulation involves quasi semantics quality. At present time computer mainly operates by mechanical simulation and communicate with man through logic language.
作者 隋然
出处 《外语与外语教学》 北大核心 2003年第2期29-33,共5页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
关键词 自然语言 逻辑语言 形式化描写 计算机认知 人脑 认知科学理论 natural language, logic language, formalarized description, computer cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Carnap R.The Naive and Application of Inductive Logic[M].University of Chicago Press,1951.
  • 2Mayr E.Toward a New Philosophy of Biology:Observations of An Evo lutionist [ M ].Cambridge,MA:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,1988.
  • 3Pattee H.(Ed.).Hierarchy Theory[M].New York:George Braziller,1973.
  • 4Shapere D.Scientific Theories and Their Domains[M].2nd Ed,University of Illionis Press,1977.
  • 5Weiss P.The Living System.In A.Koestler & J.Smythies(Eds.).Be yond Reductionism:New Perspectives In the Life Sciences [ M ].New York:Macmillan,1970.
  • 6爱因斯坦 许良英等(译).爱因斯坦文集(第一卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1976.304,75-76,314.
  • 7科恩L.理性的对话:分析哲学的分析[M].邱仁宗译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,1998.
  • 8利奇G.L.语义学[M].李瑞华等译.上海:上海外语教育出版社,1987.
  • 9钱冠连.哲学轨道上的语言研究[J].外国语,1999,22(6):9-16. 被引量:34
  • 10钱冠连.哲学轨道上的语言研究[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2000,23(1):21-23. 被引量:17

二级参考文献5

  • 1桂诗春.认知和语言[J].外语教学与研究,1991,23(3):3-9. 被引量:93
  • 2Osherson, D. N. 1995. An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts :The MIT Press.
  • 3Rose, F. 1985.The Black Knight of AI. Science. Vol.6,pp.46 - 51.
  • 4Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh -- The Emboied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
  • 5王晓静.三端集成稳压器及应用[J].电子测试,2009,20(6):74-77. 被引量:11

共引文献106

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部