期刊文献+

朝鲜半岛核危机的化解与半岛走出冷战 被引量:8

Defusing the Nuclear Crisis and Moving the Korean Peninsula away from the Cold War
原文传递
导出
摘要 第二次朝核危机是冷战结束后朝鲜半岛系列危机的新高潮 ,根源是冷战状态。危机的背后是半岛走出冷战的历史要求。这一进程必然伴随着危机、动荡和风险。半岛走出冷战意味着地区战略格局的改变 ,而朝核危机的解决可能是走出冷战的开始。半岛现有格局是一个地区性战略稳定 ,但其作用已发挥到尽头。“北京会谈”拉开了多边解决朝核危机的序幕。与此同时 ,爆发战争的风险也在上升 ,危险主要来自美国。中国在朝鲜半岛有多重战略利益 ,首要和核心利益是保持半岛和平稳定。中国应在化解半岛核危机的过程中 ,逐步建立一个新的地区多边安全合作机制 ,推动半岛和平走出冷战。 The second nuclear crisis in the Korean Peninsula is a new high in the series of crises in the peninsula since the mid-1990s.These crises reflect a historical demand for the Korean peninsula to emerge from the Cold War.But this course is bound to be difficult,full of turbulent crises and dangers.The current strategic pattern in the Korean peninsula is based on a regional strategic stability that was built some fifty years ago but that has already stopped functioning.As the current nuclear crisis in the peninsula is defused,a new strategic pattern will gradually come into being.The three-way“Beijing Talks”on 23-24 April 2003,including delegates from the DPRK,the United States,and China,marked a prelude to the multilateral approach to resolve the crisis.However,the danger of a major war,which mainly is due to the United States,continues to increase.China has legitimated multiple strategic interests in the peninsula,but maintaining peace and stability in the region is paramount.During the course of defusing the Korean nuclear crisis,China should endeavor to build a new regional security cooperation regime so as to promote peace and move the peninsula out of its Cold War state.
作者 徐纬地
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第9期59-64,共6页 World Economics and Politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Newsweek,March 2,1998, pp.36 - 37.
  • 2潘振强.关于重建全球战略稳定的理论思考[J].国际问题研究,2002(4):1-6. 被引量:5
  • 3Newsweek,May 5,2003.pp.30-31.
  • 4.温家宝总理在2003年10月印尼巴厘岛举行的首届东盟商业与投资峰会发表的题为《中国的发展和亚洲的振兴》的演讲[N].《人民日报》,2003年10月8日.
  • 5.《防止决策的随意性》[N].《解放军报》,2003.7.15.
  • 6Christion Science Monitor,June 6,2003.www.christiansciencermonitor.org/.
  • 7Colin Robinson Rear Adm.(Ret.)Stephen H.Baker,Stand-Off With North Korea:War Scenarios and Consequences,www.cdi.org/north-korea-crisis.pdf.
  • 8New York Times,June 2,2003.www.nytimes.com/.
  • 9New York Times,June 11,2003.www.nytimes.com/.

二级参考文献13

  • 1例如参见中俄两国首脑于2000年7月18日在北京签署的关于反导问题的联合声明,http:∥www. fmprc. gov. chn/3275. html
  • 2参见 Camille Grand, "Ballistic Missile Threats, Missile Defenses, Deterrence, and Strategic Stability", International Perspectives on Missile Proliferation and Defenses, Occasional Paper No. 5, Center for Nonproliferation Studies,March 2001, p. 5.
  • 3The Stanford Arms Control Group, International Arms Control, Second Edition, Stanford University Press, 1984,pp. 97-98.
  • 4王仲春和闻中华:《不散的核阴云》,国防大学出版社,2000年10月,pp.111-113.
  • 5参见 Darryl Howlett, "New Concepts of Deterrence",《International Perspectives on Missile Proliferation and Defenses》, Occasional Paper No. 5, Center for Nonproliferation Studies, March 2001, p. 19-20.
  • 6唐家璇:"在联合国裁军研讨会上的讲话",北京,2000年4月2日.
  • 7据美国方面的一个材料,截止到2001年1月,美国仍部署有处于战斗状态的核弹头9376枚,处于非战斗状态的核弹头5000枚;俄罗斯部署处于战斗状态的核弹头9196枚,非战斗状态的核弹头13500枚.参见HanChristinson, "The Unruly Hedge: Cold War Thinking at the Crawford Summit," Arms Control Today 2001年-12月, pp.8 -12.
  • 8关于美国对未来战略目标和措施的具体设想,参见2001年9月美国国防部发表的"Quadrennial Defense Review"http:∥www.defenselink mil/news/Jan2002/d2020109npr.pdr,2002年1月9日美国国防部就"Nuclear Posture Review"召开的吹风会.http:∥www.defenselink.mil/news/Jan2002/t01092002-D109npr.html,以及2002年1月20日布什总统发表的"State of Union"http:∥www.whitehouse gov/stateoftheunion/history.html.
  • 9参见 Leon Fuerth,"Tampering WithStrategic Stability", the Washington Post, February 20, 2001,http:∥www. infowar. com/mil-c4i/01/mil-022101a-j. shtml.
  • 10关于中国对新安全观的主张,参见"中国关于新安全观的立场",Apri1 2002,http:∥www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/5053.html.

共引文献103

同被引文献214

引证文献8

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部