期刊文献+

威胁认知与朝核危机 被引量:28

Threat Cognition and DPRK Nuclear Crisis
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文尝试运用认知分析的方法,特别是国际危机中的威胁认知理论,解读朝核问题。文章在系统分析“威胁”的概念、威胁认知的影响因素等理论性问题之后,研究了朝核危机发展的国家心理因素,并在此基础上提出解决朝核问题的关键因素:制度性地解决朝鲜的安全关切。
作者 邱美荣
出处 《当代亚太》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第6期3-11,共9页 Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1See Byung -joon Ahn,"The man who woudl BKim",Foreign Affairs, Nov./Dec.1994, pp.94-108; Choong-Nam Kim,"The Uncertain Future of North Korea: Soft Landing or Crash Landing?" Korea and World Affairs, Winter 1996, pp.623-636; Marcus Noland, "Why North Korea will Muddle Through", Foreign Affairs, July/August 1997,pp.105-118; Michael Green, "North Korea Regime Crisis: US Perspective and Responses", Korean Journal of Defense Analysis,Winter 1997; Nicholas Eberstadt, The End of North Korea, AEI, Washington DC, 2000; Bruce Cumings, "Feeding the North Korea Mrth", The Nation, September 29, 1997,pp.22-24;Robert Scalapino, "North Korea at a Crossroads", Hoover Essays in Public Policy, No.73, Hoover Institution, Stanford University, 1997; Aidan Foster-Carter, Korea's Coming Reunification: Another East Asian Superpower? EIU Special Report No.M212, EIU, London, 1992.
  • 2See Nicholas Eberstadt, The End of North Korea, AEI, Washington DC, 2000; Leon Sigal, Disarming Strangers: Nuclear Diplomacy with North Korea, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1998; Chung-in Moon and David Steinberg, eds., The Kim Dae-Jung Government's Sunshine Policy, Yonsei Press, Seoul, 1999; David Kang, "Preventive War and North Korea", Security Studies, Winter 1994/1995, pp.330-363; Victor Cha, "Is there still a Rational North Korea Option for War", Security Dialogue, Dec.1998, pp.447-490.
  • 3Scott Snyder, North Korea Negotiating Behavior, US Institute of Peace, Washington DC, 1999.Chuck Downs, Over the Line, AEI Press, Washington DC, 1999.
  • 4国际危机研究把"威胁"概念视为各种危机现象的核心.迈克尔·布莱特(Michael Brecher)、格伦·辛迪(Glenn Synder)以及保罗·迪辛(Paul Diesing)学者等把对"决策单元高度优先目标"的威胁视为国际危机的基本特征之一.See M.Brecher,"Towards a Theory of International Crisis Behavior", International Studies Quarterly, March 1977, pp.43-44; G.H.Snyder and P.Diesing, Conflict among Nations, Princeton University Press, NJ, 1977,p.6.
  • 5Klaus Knorr, "Threat Perception", in Klaus Knorr, ed., Historical Dimensions of National Security Problems, Lawrence Press, Kansas, 1976,p.78.Ole R.Holsti, Crisis, Escalation, War, McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal, 1972, pp.51-70.
  • 6Ole R.Holsti, Robert North and Richard A.Brody,"Perception and Action in the 1914 Crisis", in J.David Singer, ed., Quantitative International Politics, Free Press, New York, 1968, pp.123-158.
  • 7Ole R.Holsti, et al., "Perception and Action in the 1914 Crisis", p.152.
  • 8根据Richard Snyder的观点引申而来.Snyder 及其同事将动机分为目的性动机和原因性动机两种.See Richard Snyder et al ., Foreign Policy Decision-Making, Free Press, New York,1963, p.144.
  • 9转引自T.W.Milburn,"The Nature of Threat",Journal of Social Issues, 33, 1977, p.126.
  • 10David Baldwin,"Thinking about Threats", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15, 1971, pp.71-78.

二级参考文献9

  • 1潘振强.关于重建全球战略稳定的理论思考[J].国际问题研究,2002(4):1-6. 被引量:5
  • 2.温家宝总理在2003年10月印尼巴厘岛举行的首届东盟商业与投资峰会发表的题为《中国的发展和亚洲的振兴》的演讲[N].《人民日报》,2003年10月8日.
  • 3.《防止决策的随意性》[N].《解放军报》,2003.7.15.
  • 4Newsweek,March 2,1998, pp.36 - 37.
  • 5Newsweek,May 5,2003.pp.30-31.
  • 6Christion Science Monitor,June 6,2003.www.christiansciencermonitor.org/.
  • 7Colin Robinson Rear Adm.(Ret.)Stephen H.Baker,Stand-Off With North Korea:War Scenarios and Consequences,www.cdi.org/north-korea-crisis.pdf.
  • 8New York Times,June 2,2003.www.nytimes.com/.
  • 9New York Times,June 11,2003.www.nytimes.com/.

共引文献40

同被引文献459

引证文献28

二级引证文献193

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部