期刊文献+

头孢地尼与头孢特伦多中心随机对照临床研究 被引量:13

Multicenter randomized controlled clinical study of cefdinir and cefteram
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 评价头孢地尼治疗呼吸系统、泌尿系统和皮肤软组织细菌感染的安全性和有效性。方法采用多中心随机对照试验。头孢地尼与头孢特伦均为 10 0 mg~ 2 0 0 mg tid,疗程 7~ 14 d。结果 头孢地尼组10 2例 ,头孢特伦组 10 6例 ,总痊愈率分别为 72 .5 5 %和 6 9.81% ,总有效率分别为 96 .10 %和 92 .4 5 %。呼吸系统痊愈率为 6 3.6 4 %和 72 .0 9% ,有效率为 90 .91%和 95 .35 % ;泌尿系统的痊愈率分别为 87.1%和 72 .73% ,有效率为 10 0 %和 90 % ;皮肤软组织的痊愈率分别为 70 .37%和 6 3.33% ,有效率为 10 0 %和 90 % ;细菌清除率分别为 89.0 1%和 94 .5 1%。两组的不良反应率为 7.2 6 %和 8.5 1%。统计学差异均无显著性。结论 头孢地尼治疗轻至中度的细菌性感染安全有效。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of cefdinir in the treatment of acute bacterial infection. Methods Multicenter randomized controlled clinial study of cefdinir and cefteram were given at a dose of 100~200mg tid for 7~14 days. Results 208 patients enrolled in the study were divided into two groups, 102 cases were treated with cefedinir and 106 cases with cefteram as control. The cure rates of cefdinir and cefterom were 72.55% and 69.81%, the effective rates were 96.10% and 92.45% respectively. As for respiratory tract infection, the effective rates were 90.91% and 95.35%, cure rates 63.64% and 72.09%. For urinary tract infection, the effective rates were 100% and 90.91%, cure rates 87.10% and 72.73%; Skin and soft tissue infection, the effective rates 100% and 90% and cure rates 70.37%, 63.33% respectivly. Both agents were well tolerated, 7.26% and 8.15% of patients in the cefdinir and ceftream groups respectively experienced adverse events. There were no statistical significant difference. Conclusion Cefdinir is safe and effective in the treatment of slight and moderate bacterial infections.
出处 《中国抗生素杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第9期555-561,共7页 Chinese Journal of Antibiotics
关键词 头孢地尼 头孢特伦 随机对照 细菌感染 Cefdinir Cefteram Randomized controlled Bacterial infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Fung-Tomc J C, Huczko E, Sticule T, et al. Antimicrobial activities of cefprozil compared with those of 13 oral cephems and 3 macrolides[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1995,39(2) :533.
  • 2Tamura S, Miyazaki S, Tateda K, et al. In vivo antibacterial activities of sanfetrinem cilexetil, a new oral tricycic antibiotic [J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1998,42(7):1858.
  • 3Fukuoka T, Ohya S, Utsui Y, et al. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of CS-834, a novel oral carbapenem[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother , 1997,41 (12) : 2652.
  • 4Hikida M, Itahashi K, Igarashi A, et al. In vivo antibacterial activitiy of LJC 11,036, an active metabolite of L-084, a new oral carbapem antibiotic with potent antipneumococcal activity[J]. Antimicrob Agents Ckemotker,1999,43(8) :2010.
  • 5Richer M, Allard S, Manseau L, et al. Suction-induced blister fluid penetration of cefdinir in healthy volunteers following ascending oral doses [J]. Antimlcrob Agents Chemother,1995,39(5):1082.
  • 6Guay O R P. Cefdinir: an advanced-generation, broadspectrum oral cephalosporin [J]. Clin Ther,2002,24(4):473.
  • 7Sperling M J, Puopolo A, Griffin T J, et al. Efficacy and safety cefdinir in the treatment of patients with acute bronchitis[J]. Clin Ther,1996,18(4) :626.
  • 8Fogart C M, Bianehi P, Eyserling C H, et al. Comparison of a 5 day regimen of eefdinir with a 10 day regimen of cefprozil for treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis[J]. J Antimicrob Chemothe, 2000,45() : 851.
  • 9Orchobl M, Bianchi P, Eyserling C H, et al. Comparison of cefdinir and cefaclor in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1997,41(7):1579.

同被引文献163

引证文献13

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部