摘要
非法证据的排除规则是目前我国论证刑事证据立法中的一个热点问题。在近代 ,美国和德国作为英美法系和大陆法系的典型代表国家在设立和发展这个规则的立法和司法实践方面取得了丰富的经验。通过对两国排除规则的内涵 ,设立排除规则所要达到的目的 (或称为排除规则的理念 ) ,排除规则的范围 ,运用排除规则的限制等进行比较研究 。
Exclusionary rules of illegally gained evidence is a hot topic in proving criminal evidence legislation. In modern time, the United States and Germany, as the typical representatives of common law system and civil law system, have gained rich experience in establishing and developing the rule in both theory and practice. Comparative study will benefit the establishment of exclusionary rules in China in the aspect of the connotation of exclusionary rules, the purpose of creating exclusionary rules (or called the notion of exclusionary rules), the scope of exclusionary rules, the limits of using exclusionary rules.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第3期178-191,共14页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
