摘要
美国、欧盟反倾销法在对倾销和损害的判定、反倾销的程序和措施等原则问题上与WTO基本一致,但在“正常价值的确定”、“公共利益的考虑”、“对出口商替进口商交纳反倾销税的作弊行为的制裁”、“反规避的措施”和“承诺”问题上,又有着不同的理解和规定。了解这些,有助于完善我国反倾销法以及更好地应对美国、欧盟反倾调查。
The anti-dumping laws of the U.S.A.and the E.U.show no differences from those of the WTO in some principles about confirmation of dumping,its impairment,the suing procedures and measures concerned.However,they do have different under-standing of and stipulations on some issues such as confirmation of normal values and the consideration of the public interest.The paper holds that to have a good idea of all these points will help to improve China's anti-dumping countermeasures so as to secure a positive position in coping with the anti-dumping investigation of the U.S.A.and the E.U.
出处
《国际经贸探索》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第4期65-68,共4页
International Economics and Trade Research
