期刊文献+

现实理性:一个理解经济行为的框架 被引量:11

Practical Reason: A Framework For Understanding Economic Behavior
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文将人类理性的现实表现作为理解经济行为的框架。该框架强调,主观上人类有效用最大化的追求,但由于感知觉和思维加工能力的缺陷,行为表现经常偏离理论理性。文章从认知心理学的角度介绍Kahneman和Tversky的主要研究成果,包括影响最大的前景理论,其他有关算法式和偏误的研究,以及决策和情绪的关系。文章的最后还介绍对Kahneman和Tversky的批评。 This paper used 損ractical reason?as a framework for understanding economic behaviors of human being. This position proposed that economic behavior would systemically depart from traditionally economic reason due to human limitations in perception and processing of thinking. This paper introduced Kahneman and Tverskys main work from perspective of cognitive psychology, including well-known prospect theory, what were called heuristics and biases approach and relation between decision-making and emotion. Criticisms of Kahneman and Tverskys work were presented in the finial section.
作者 张结海 张玲
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2003年第3期267-273,共7页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 现实理性 行为经济学 经济决策 前景理论 两阶段理论 算法式 偏误 情绪 KAHNEMAN Tversky Gigernzer practical reason, behavioral economics, decision-making.
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1张结海.直觉现象与理性[J].心理学探新,1997,20:255-258.
  • 2张结海,朱正才.归因是怎样影响假设思维的?[J].心理学报,2003,35(2):237-245. 被引量:10
  • 3赫伯特·西蒙.现代决策理论基石—有限理性说[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社,1991..
  • 4Tversky A, Kahneman D. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 1983, 90 (4): 293-315.
  • 5Loomes G, Sugden R. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 1982, 92:805-824.
  • 6Kahneman D, Tversky A. The simulation heuristic. In: Kahneman D, Slovic R Tversky A ed. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982. 201-208.
  • 7Samuelson W, Richard Z. Status Quo Bias in Decision Making, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty," 1988, 1 (March): 7-59.
  • 8Kahneman D, Miller D T. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 1986, 93:136-153.
  • 9Gigerenzer G, Goldstein D G. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 1996, 103, 650-669.
  • 10Gigerenzer G. How to make cognitive illusions disappear:. Beyond "heuristics and biases." In: Stroebe W, Hewstone Med. European Review of Social Psychology.Vol. 2. Cbichester, England: Wiley, 1991.83-115.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Kahneman D, Tversky A. The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 1982, 246: 160~173
  • 2Kahneman D, Tversky A. The simulation heuristic. In: D Kahneman, P Slovic, A Tversky ed, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1892. 201~208
  • 3Gilovich T, Medvec V H, Chen S. Omission, commission, and dissonance reduction: Overcoming regret in the Monty Hall problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995, 21: 182~190
  • 4Wells G L, Taylor B R, Turtle J W. The undoing of scenarios. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 53: 421~430
  • 5N'gbala A, Branscombe N R. Mental simulation and causal attribution: When simulating an event does not affect fault assignment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1995, 31: 139~162
  • 6Landman J. Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1987, 13: 524~536
  • 7Gavanski I, Wells G L. Counterfactual processing of normal and exceptional events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1989, 25: 314~325
  • 8Wells G L, Gavanski I. Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 56: 161~169
  • 9Gilovich T, Medvec V H. The temporal pattern to the experience of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 67: 357~365
  • 10Davis C G, Lehman D R, Wortman C B, Silver R C, Thompson S C. The undoing of traumatic life events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995, 21: 109~124

共引文献9

同被引文献184

引证文献11

二级引证文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部