期刊文献+

手术刀与电刀游离乳腺癌切口皮瓣术后生活质量比较 被引量:5

Compare the quality of post-operation life by using lancet or electric knife to free incision skin flap in mammary cancer operation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨乳腺癌手术中应用电刀与手术刀游离切口皮瓣术后生活质量的差异性及证明应用电刀可降低手术中的出血量而不增加术后并发症的发生。方法2000-03/2002-11,按手术次序先后对102例行Halsted乳腺癌根治术的患者进行分组研究。次序单数为A组,共51例,用电刀游离切口皮瓣。次序双数为B组共51例,用手术刀游离切口皮瓣。全部患者的切口皮瓣设计都能无张力缝合,除了游离切口皮瓣的器械不同外,其余操作基本一样且由同一人主刀。两组患者的围手术期治疗亦基本相同。分别记录两组患者手术时游离切口皮瓣的出血量及时间,术后第7天观察切口皮瓣并发症的发生情况。在手术恢复期进行生活质量评估并对其数据进行统计学分析。观察数据用方差分析和t检验及χ2检验。结果乳腺癌手术中游离切口皮瓣使用电刀操作和手术刀操作二者对患者术后的生活质量的影响无明显的差异(χ2=1.009,P>0.05),手术时间及围手术期副作用亦差异不显著(χ2=0.374,P>0.05),可实际应用时电刀的出血量较手术刀明显减少(t=80.65,P<0.05)。结论虽然乳腺癌应用电刀与手术刀在患者术后的生活质量影响不大,但应用电刀游离切口皮瓣出血量少,不增加手术并发症,操作更方便可行。 Aim To analyze the different quality of life after mammary cancer operation by using lancet or electric knife and certify electric knife reducing the number of the bleeding in the operation without post operative complication.Methods 102 female patients treated with Halsted radical mastectomy 2000 05/2002 11,were randomly divided into group A of 51 cases of odd numbers and group B of 51 cases of even numbers according to operation order. Group A was treated with electric knives to free the incision skin flap, and group B was treated with scalpals to do it. All incision skin flaps were sown up without tension. The operations in two groups were fundamentally similar except for the instruments to free the incision skin flap. The amount of bleeding and time of the operation were recorded in two groups respectively, and the complication caused by incision skin flaps was observed 7d after in two groups. The quality of life in convalescent period were evaluated and statistically analyzed in two groups.Results The postoperative quality of life were not significantly different between the group A and group B (χ2=1.009,P >0.05)as well as the time of operation and side effects(χ2=0.374,P >0.05). Actually the amount of bleeding in group A was further less than that in group B(t=80.65,P< 0.05).Conclusion The quality of life were not significantly different between the treatment with electrical knife and the treatment with operating knife, however, the amount of bleeding and rate of complication decreased by the usage of electric knife which supported a comfortable operation.
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 2003年第11期1678-1679,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
关键词 手术刀 电刀 游离切口皮瓣 乳腺癌 术后 生活质量 比较 恢复期 出血量 breast neoplasms quality of life electrosurgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1徐震雷,张苏范,王颖,张冀岗,洪韵琳.乳腺癌患者个性特点研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(4):169-170. 被引量:27
  • 2严和亲 沈渔村.心理生理障碍与心身疾病.精神病学(第2版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.726.
  • 3Ozyilkan O, Baltali E, Tekuzman G, et al. The impact of diagnosis and treatment on the quality of life in breast cancer patients[J]. Neoplasma,1998, 45(1): 50~52
  • 4Lawton MP. Quality of life in chronic illness[J]. Gerontology, 1999, 45(4): 181~183
  • 5Dijkers M. Measuring quality of life: methodological issues[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 1999, 78(3): 286~300.
  • 6Visser MR, Smets EM. Fatigue, depression and quality of life in cancer patients: how are they related[J]? Support Care Cancer, 1998, 6(2): 101~108.
  • 7Montazeri A, Gillis CR, McEwen J. Quality of life in patients with lung cancer: a review of literature from 1970 to 1995[J]. Am J Crit Care,1998, 7(2): 106~116
  • 8Montazeri A, Gillis CR, McEwen J. Quality of life in patients with lung cancer: a review of literature from 1970 to 1995[J]. Am J Crit Care,1998, 7(2): 106~116
  • 9Wood Dauphinee S. Assessing quality of life in clinical research: from where have we come and where are we going[J]? J Clin Epidemiol,1999.52(4): 355~363
  • 10Irvine EJ. Development and subsequent refinement of the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire: a quality -of -life instrument for adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999, 28(4): 23~27

共引文献57

同被引文献14

  • 1孙慎友,吴诚义.生活质量研究在乳腺癌治疗中的应用现状[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(20):4074-4076. 被引量:16
  • 2[1]Simonton SS, Sherman AC. Psychological aspects of mind-body medicine:promises and pitfalls from research with cancer patients. Altern Ther Health Med1998; 4(4): 50 - 8, 60, 62 - 4
  • 3[2]Sobin LH, Fleming ID. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, fifth edition (1997) . Union Internationale Contre le Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer 1997; 80:1803 -4
  • 4[3]Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of cancer: Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument. J Clin Oncol 1997;15 (3 ): 974 - 86
  • 5[8]Cole BF, Geber RD, Anderson KM. Parametric approaches to quality-adjsted suvial analysis. Biometrtcs 1994; 50(3): 621
  • 6Silonton SS, Sheman AC. Psychological aspects of mind-body medicine: promises And pitfalls from research with cancer patients [J]. Altern Ther Health Med 1998,4(4) .50-58,62-64
  • 7Ferrell BR , Hassey Dow K,Grant M, Measurement of the QOL in cancer survivors[J].Quality of Life Research, 1995,4 : 523 - 531
  • 8袁海娟.乳腺癌改良根治术后两种负压引流方法效果对比[J].实用临床医药杂志,2011,15(6):3-4. 被引量:10
  • 9李春梅,陈锦坚,吴燕梅,刘莉萍,罗爱萍,何颜英.高负压引流在乳腺癌改良根治术中的应用与护理[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2013,20(1):57-59. 被引量:5
  • 10李宏江,赵扬冰,陈国经,敬静,徐卫云,陈佩珍.乳腺癌术后影响患肢功能康复的原因[J].中国康复,2001,16(3):138-139. 被引量:17

引证文献5

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部