摘要
对于钟嵘《诗品》郭璞条 ,有两点学界分歧较大。首先是郭璞和玄言诗的关系问题 ,钟嵘与檀道鸾意见不一 ,从而引起今人争议。实际上 ,钟、檀二人只是从各自对郭诗不同层面的认识出发 ,来评价其在魏晋诗歌史上的地位 ,并不存在根本的矛盾。其次是钟嵘对郭璞《游仙》诗的态度问题 ,清代学者对钟嵘的不满 ,极有可能是因版本讹滥造成误读所致。另外 ,充分认识钟嵘论诗思想性与艺术性兼顾的特点 ,是我们正确解读《诗品》
About item of Guopu in Zhongrong’s 《Shipin》, there are two differences in academic circles. One is the relation of Guopu and Xuanyanshi, Guopu’s opinion is different from Tandaoluan’s, it gives rise to good deal of controversy. In fact, Zhong and Tan’s opinions gain from different point of view to Guopu’s poem, there isn’t the basic contradiction. The other is Zhongrong’s attitudes to Guopu《Youxian》poem, maybe it is caused by edition’s mistake that scholars in Qing dynasty are unsatisfied with Zhongrong. It is the key to correctly explain the item in《Shipin》about Guopu that knowing the characteristic of Zhongrong’s comment on poem deeply.
出处
《中国文学研究》
北大核心
2003年第2期40-42,共3页
Research of Chinese Literature
