期刊文献+

基于空间映射观念的地图综合概念模式 被引量:15

The Conceptual Schema of Map Generalization from Spatial Mapping Perspective
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于关系代数的映射变换思想,将地图综合的概念框架划分为2种映射形式:空间实体映射和空间关系映射,根据变换前后空间实体数目的变化,空间实体映射进一步区分为1 1,n 1,n m映射。空间关系映射则视为拓扑关系、距离关系、方向关系3种基本关系的复合变换。为描述综合过程中粗化表达,建立了"空间关系分辨率"概念,基于9交叉、主方向模型以及本文自行建立的"等距离关系"模型分别给出了拓扑关系、方向关系、距离关系中分辨率的表达方式。在概念级上讨论了2种映射在地图综合过程的表现形式,这一综合模式与传统方法的显著区别是,它强调了关系也存在综合的问题。 From the point of view of mapping transformation, this paper presents a map generalization conceptual framework which regards generalization as two kinds of mapping procedures: spatial entity mapping and spatial relationship mapping. According to the number of changes in the participating entities, spatial entity mapping is classified as 11, n1, nm mapping. Spatial relationship mapping is described as a composite relationship transformation of the components: topology, distance and orientation. The concept 'spatial relationship resolution' is introduced to describe spatial relationship related constraints. Based on the 9 intersection model, the cardinal direction model and the isodistancerelationship model, the paper gives three sorts of relationship resolution representations for topological, distance and orientation relationship respectively. The behavior of the two mappings in map generalization is discussed and a special emphasis on the spatial relationship abstraction is placed compared with the traditional generalization conceptual model.
作者 艾廷华
出处 《测绘学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2003年第1期87-92,共6页 Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica
基金 自然科学基金资助项目(40101023)
关键词 地图综合 空间关系 空间关系分辨率 空间实体映射 空间关系映射 拓扑关系 map generalization spatial relationship spatial relationship resolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1BRASSEL K E, WEIBEL R. A Review and Framework of Automated Map Generalization[ J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems,1988,2(3): 229-244.
  • 2BJORKE J T. Framework for Entropy-based Map Evaluation[J]. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 1996,23(2):78-95.
  • 3WEBER W. Map Generalization An Information Science Approach[ A]. Contributions to Map Generalization Proceedings [ C ]. Norway: Norweigian Computing Center, 1980.
  • 4LONERGAN M E, JONES C B, WARE J M. Optimal Map Generalization: Saving Time with Appropriate Measures of Imperfection[ A]. CD-Rom Proceedings 19th Int. Cartographic Conference[C]. Ottawa:[s.n.], 1999.
  • 5WARE J M, JONES C B. Conflict Reduction in Map Generalization Using Iterative Improvement [ J ].Geoinfomatica, 1998, 2(4): 383-407.
  • 6LAMY S, RUAS A, DEMAZEAU Y, et al. The Application of Agents in Automated Map Generalization[A]. CD-Rom Proceedings 19th Int. Cartographic Conference[ C]. Ottawa: [s. n. ], 1999.
  • 7WU H H. Structured Approach to Implementing Automatic Cartographic Generalization [ A ]. Proceedings of the 18th ICC, Stockholm[C]. Sweden: [s. n.],1997.
  • 8EGENHOFER M J, MARK D. Modeling Conceptual Neighborhoods of Topological Line-Region Relationships[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1995,9 (5): 555-565.
  • 9FRANK A U. Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: Cardinal Directions as an Example[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1996, 10 (3):269-290.
  • 10FRANK A U. Qualitative Spatial Reasoning about Distances and Directions in Geographic Space [ J]. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 1992,3: 343-371.

同被引文献209

引证文献15

二级引证文献220

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部