摘要
目的 比较挤压涂片法与透明胶纸粘贴法对蠕形螨的检出效果。方法 应用挤压法与粘贴法对同一人群进行蠕形螨检查。结果 在鼻部采用挤压法检查蠕形螨阳性率为 37.86 % ,粘贴法检查阳性率为 33.35 % ,挤压法检出率高于粘贴法 (χ2 =1 6 .0 4 ,P <0 .0 0 5)。两法检查不同性别人群阳性率差异均无显著意义 ,且均为轻度感染者居多 ,中度次之 ,重度较少。结论 检查蠕形螨 ,在鼻部取材 。
Objective To compare the two methods of squeezing and cellophane tape in Demodex-detecting efficiency.Methods Squeezing method and cellophane tape method were used to detect nasal Demodex infection in the same population.Results The infection rate of Demodex was 37.86 % (1 450/3 830) and 33.33 % (1 149/3 445) respectively by squeezing method and cellophane tape method(χ 2=16.04, P <0.005). There were no significant gender differences in the infection rate whichever method was used. Mild Demodex infection was quite common, and was followed by moderate infection, then severe infection.Conclusions Squeezing method has higher deteced out rate than cellophane method, if the detection site of Demodex is on the nose.
出处
《中国学校卫生》
CAS
北大核心
2003年第1期26-27,共2页
Chinese Journal of School Health
关键词
螨感染
挤压法
粘贴法
学生
Mite infestations
Squeezing method
Cellophane tap method
Student
