期刊文献+

麻醉深度与肌松程度对运动诱发电位影响的比较 被引量:12

A comparison of the influence of anesthesia depth and neuromuscular blockade on motor evoked potentials
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 比较麻醉深度和神经肌肉阻滞程度对经颅磁刺激运动诱发电位 (tcMMEPs)的影响。方法  2 5例择期行脊髓手术的病人 ,分别在清醒时及BIS值为 75~ 6 5、6 5~ 5 5和 5 0~ 30时记录tcMMEPs的波形 ;维持肌松使 4个成串刺激的第一个刺激T1在 5 0 %左右 ,重复上述实验。结果  (1)在没有神经肌肉阻滞时 ,麻醉后tcMMEPs的波幅在各BIS值范围内与清醒时相比均显著减小 (P <0 0 0 1) ,但随后并不随着麻醉的继续加深而下降 (P >0 0 5 ) ,只有当BIS值达到 5 0~ 30的范围时其波幅与BIS值在 75~ 6 5时相比才有显著下降 (P <0 0 0 1)。 (2 )当T1在 5 0 %左右时 ,各BIS值范围内的波幅与清醒时相比均有非常显著差异 (P <0 0 0 1) ,且每个BIS范围内的数值与同组T1为 10 0 %时相比均有显著性差异 (P <0 0 0 1) ,而各BIS范围之间的波幅无显著性差异 (P >0 0 5 )。 Objective To compare the influence of anesthesia depth and neuromuscular blockade on transcranial magnatic motor evoked potentials(tcMMEPs).Methods Twenty five patients undergoing elective spinal surgery were involved.To record the waves of tcMMEPs at following periods:awake and bispectral index(BIS) at 75 65,65 55,50 30 respectively.Under the T 1 value of TOF at about 50%,the study as above was repeated.Results (1)Without neuromuscular blockade,the amplitude of tcMMEPs after anesthesia decreased significantly compared to that before at all BIS levels( P< 0 001).The amplitudes had no change when anesthesia was deepened until BIS was at 50 30,after which it was decreased significantly( P< 0 001).(2)When T 1 was at 50%,all amplitude values had significant differences compared with the value of awake ( P< 0 001),and was significantly smaller than those of T 1=100% at the same BIS ( P< 0 001).There was no difference in the amplitudes among the BIS ranges( P> 0 05).Conclusions The influence of neuromuscular blockade on the amplitude of tcMMEPs is greater than that of anesthesia depth. [
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2003年第2期84-86,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 麻醉深度 肌松程度 运动诱发电位 比较 经颅磁刺激运动诱发电位 神经肌肉阻滞 Transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials(tcMMEPs) Bispectral index Neuromuscular blockade Monitoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]Herdmann J,Deletis V,Edmonds HJ,et al.Spinal cord and nerve root monitoring in spine surgery and related procedures.Spine,1996,21:879-885.
  • 2[2]Kalkman CJ,Drummond JC,Ribberink AA,et al.Effects of propofol,etomidate,midazolam,and fentanyl on motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation in humans.Anesthesiology,1992,76:502-509.
  • 3[3]Sloan TB,Erian R.Effect of atracurium-induced neuromuscular block on cortical motorevoked potentials.Anesth Analg,1993,76:979-984.
  • 4[4]Mills KR.Magnetic brain stimulation:a tool to explore the action of the motor cortex on single human spinal motoneurons.Trends Neurosci,1991,14:401-405.
  • 5[5]Ubags LH, Kalkman CJ, Been HD, et al.A comparison of myogenic motor evoked responses to electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation during nitrous oxide/opioid anesthesia.Anesth Analg,1999,88:568-572.
  • 6[6]Zhou H,Zhu C.Comparison of isoflurane effects on motor evoked potential and F wave.Anesthesiology,2000,93:32-38.
  • 7[7]Dongen EP,Beek HT,Schepens M,et al.Within-patient variability of myogenic motor evoked potentials to multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation during two levels of partial neuromuscular blockade in aortic surgery.Anesth Analg,1999,88:22-27.
  • 8[8]Kuizenga K,Wierda J,Kalkman CJ.Biphasic EEG changes in relation to loss of consciousness during induction with thiopental,propofol,etomidate,midazolam or sevoflurane.Br J Anaesth,2001,86:354-360.
  • 9贾宝森,岳云.吸入麻醉下内隐记忆与脑电双频谱指数的关系[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2000,20(6):344-346. 被引量:19

二级参考文献3

共引文献18

同被引文献78

  • 1周翔,周范民.听神经瘤手术中面神经保留的影响因素[J].国外医学(神经病学.神经外科学分册),2004,31(3):217-220. 被引量:18
  • 2刘宏亮.神经电生理检查在脊髓损伤功能评定中的应用[J].继续医学教育,2006,20(30):38-41. 被引量:9
  • 3Scheufler KM, Zentner J. Motor-evoked potential facilitation during progressive cortical suppression by propofol. Anesth Analg, 2002, 94:907-912.
  • 4Ubags LH, Kalkman CJ, Been HD, et al. A comparison of myogenic motor evoked responses to electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation during nitrous oxide/opioid anesthesia. Anesth Analg, 1999, 88:568-572.
  • 5Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Profice P, et al. Ketamine increases human motor cortex excitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Physiol, 2003, 547:485-496.
  • 6Houlden DA, Schwartz ML, Tator CH, et al. Spinal cordevoked potentials and muscle responses evoked by transeranial magnetic stimulation in 10 awake human subjects: J Neurosei, 1999,19 : 1855-1862.
  • 7周立春,潘映辐.诱发电位的测量、各参量的生理意义与临床解释//潘映辐,主编.临床诱发电位学.第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2000:55-56.
  • 8Kawaguchi M, Furuya H. Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring of motor function with myogenic motor evoked potentials: a consideration in anesthesia. J Anesth, 2004, 18:18-28. :
  • 9Blinder J, El Mansouri M, Connelly NR. Survey of anesthesia practice in spine surgery patients in the United State[J]. J Anesth,2003,17(1) :8- 12.
  • 10Gala F. Motor evoked potentia/monitoring improves outcome aftersurgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a hisorical cont rol study [J]. Neurosurgery, 2006,58 (6) : 1129- 1143.

引证文献12

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部