期刊文献+

一种具有不同形式偏好信息的群决策方法 被引量:32

A Method for Group Decision Making Problems with Different Forms of Preference Information
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 给出了一种具有不同形式偏好信息的群决策方法·描述了在群决策中决策者可能给出的效用值、序关系值、互反判断矩阵、区间数评价值、模糊语言评价值和模糊互补判断矩阵等 6种不同形式的偏好信息 ,并给出了将不同形式的偏好信息均转化为模糊互补判断矩阵形式的计算公式·基于近年来最新发展的OWA算子给出了集结各决策者的偏好信息和方案优选的方法 ;最后给出了一个算例· A method for group decision making with different forms of preference information was proposed. Six forms of preference information provided by decision maker in group decision making, such as utility value, preference ordering, multiplicative judgement matrix, interval numbers, linguistic assessment value and fuzzy reciprocal judgement matrix, were described. The computational formulas were given to uniform six different forms of preference information into the form of fuzzy reciprocal judgement matrix. Based on OWA (Ordered Weighted Averaing) aggregation operators, an approach was presented to aggregate the preference information provided by every decision maker and select the most desirable alternative(s). A numerical example was used to illustrate the use of the proposed method.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第2期178-181,共4页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目 ( 70 0 710 0 4) 教育部高等学校青年教师教学科研奖励计划项目 (教人司 [2 0 0 2 ] 12 3) 教育部高等学校骨干教师资助计划项目 (教技司 [2 0 0 0 ] 6 5 ) 辽宁省自然科学基金资助项目 ( 0 0 2 0 12 )
关键词 群决策 偏好信息 一致化 OWA算子 集结 方案优选 group decision making preference information uniformity OWA aggregation operators aggregation alternative selection
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1998,97:33-48.
  • 2Delgado M, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, et al. Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making[J]. Information Sciences, 1998,107:177-194.
  • 3Satty T L. The analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.33-45.
  • 4Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A sequential selection process in group decision-making with linguistic assessments[J]. Information Sciences, 1995,85:223-229.
  • 5Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A linguistic decision process in group decision process in group decision making[J]. Group Decision Negotiation, 1996,(5):165-176.
  • 6Yager R R, Detyniecki M, Bouchon-Meunier B. A context-dependent method for ordering fuzzy numbers using probabilities[J]. Information Science, 2001,138:237-255.
  • 7Lian G S. Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999,112:682-691.
  • 8Chang P L, Chen Y C. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for technology transfer strategy selection in biotechnology[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1994,63:131-139.
  • 9Yager R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1988,18:183-190.
  • 10Yager R R. Applications and extensions of OWA aggregations[J]. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1992,37:103-132.

同被引文献333

引证文献32

二级引证文献179

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部