期刊文献+

权重信息不完全的二元语义多属性群决策方法 被引量:26

Two-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete attribute weight information
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对解决具有语言评价信息的多属性群决策问题,提出了一种基于最大偏差和二元语义信息处理的群决策方法。该方法是采用近年来最新发展的二元语义概念对语言评价信息进行处理和运算。对于属性权重完全未知或属性权重信息不完全的情形,分别给出了一个求解属性权重的简洁公式和一个基于最大偏差的目标规划模型,分别获得相应的属性权重,然后利用二元语义加权算术平均(T-WAA)算子,对二元语义决策信息进行加权集成,继而对决策方案进行排序和择优。该方法具有对语言信息处理较为精确的特点,避免了以往采用的语言信息处理方法所带来的信息扭曲和损失。最后给出了一个实例分析。结果表明该方法简单,有效和易于计算。 With respect to multiple attribute group decision making problems with linguistic assessment information, a new method based on maximizing deviation and two-tuple is proposed. In this method, the two-tuple linguistic representation developed in recent years is used to aggregate the linguistic assessment information. An optimization model based on the maximizing deviation method, by which the attribute weights can be determined, is established. For the special situations where the information about attribute weights is completely unknown, another optimization model is established. By solving this model, a simple and exact formula can be used to determine the attribute weights. The two-tuple linguistic weighting arithmetic average (T-WAA) operator is utilized to aggregate the linguistic information corresponding to each alternative in order to rank the alternatives and select the most desirable one(s). This method has exact characteristic in linguistic information processing, so that the information distortion and losing which occur formerly in the linguistic information processing are avoided. Finally, a numerical example is used to illustrate the approach is simple, effective and easy to calculate.
作者 卫贵武
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期273-277,共5页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助课题(70501025)
关键词 群决策 语言评价信息 二元语义 T-WAA算子 group decision making linguistic assessment information two-tuple two-tuple linguistic weighting arithmetic average (T-WAA) operator
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Herrera F, Verdegay J L. Linguistic accessments in group decision[C] //Proceedings of l th European Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Technologies, Aachen: Verlag der Augustinus , 1993:941-948.
  • 2王欣荣,樊治平.一种具有不同形式偏好信息的群决策方法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2003,24(2):178-181. 被引量:32
  • 3Orlovski S A. Decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems ,1986,18 (1) : 105 - 118.
  • 4Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J. A linguistic decision process in group decision making[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1996, 5 (1): 165-176.
  • 5Delgado M, Verdegay J L, Vila M A. On aggregation operations of linguistic labels[J]. International Journal of Intelligent System, 1993, 8 (2): 351-370.
  • 6Herrera F, Martinez L. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model based on a symbolic translation[C] // Proceeding Euro- fuse-Science Conference, Budapest : Sogesci-BVWB , 1999 : 25 - 28.
  • 7Herrera F, Martinez L. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words[J]. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8 (6): 746-752.
  • 8Herrera F, Martinez L. A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranularity hierarchical linguistic contexts inmultiexpert decision-making[J]. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part B : Cybernetics, 2001, 31(2) : 227 - 234.
  • 9王欣荣,樊治平.基于二元语义信息处理的一种语言群决策方法[J].管理科学学报,2003,6(5):1-5. 被引量:72
  • 10魏峰,刘淳安,刘三阳.基于不确定信息处理的语言群决策方法[J].运筹与管理,2006,15(3):31-35. 被引量:17

二级参考文献85

  • 1[1]Herrera F, Martinez L. A 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Representation Model for Computing with Words[J]. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems,2000,8(6) :746 - 752.
  • 2[2]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A Sequential Selection Process in Group Decision Making with Linguistic Assessment [J]. Information Science, 1995,85:233 - 239.
  • 3[3]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Linguistic Decision Analysis: Steps for Solving Decision Problems under Linguistic Information [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000,115:67-82.
  • 4[4]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A Model of Consensus in Group Decision Making under Linguistic Assessments [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996,79:73 - 87.
  • 5[5]Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G. A Linguistic Modeing of Consensus in Group Decision Making Based on OWA Operators[J]. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part A: Systems and Humans, 1997,27(1):126- 132.
  • 6[6]Delgado M, Verdegay J L, Vila M A. On Aggregation Operations of Linguistic Label [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1993, 8:351 - 370.
  • 7[7]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. Choice Process for Nonhomogeneous Group Decision Making in Linguistic Setting [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1998,94:287-308.
  • 8[8]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL. Direct Approach Processes in Group Decision Making Using Linguistic OWA Operators [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1996, 78: 73 - 87.
  • 9[9]Herrera F, Martinez L. A Model Based on Linguistic 2-Tuples for Dealing with Multigranularity Hierarchical Linguistic Contexts in Multiexpert Decision-Making [J]. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Msn and Cybernetics.Part B: Cybernetics,2001,31(2) :227 - 234.
  • 10[10]Yager R R. On Ordered Weighted Averaging Aggregation Operattors in Multicriteria Decision Making [J]. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1988,18:183 - 190.

共引文献413

同被引文献294

引证文献26

二级引证文献180

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部