摘要
在因冒名婚姻登记,尤其是新行政诉讼法实施之前发生的冒名婚姻登记引发的行政诉讼中,人民法院在适用起诉期限规定与救济当事人基本权利之间始终存在权衡难题。“尚某某诉如东县民政局婚姻行政登记”一案确认无效并删除登记信息的裁判结果,为此类争议的解决带来了新的思路,但也引起了有关裁判方式适法性的质疑,以及对于此类不符合起诉条件的行政争议是否存在其他法定救济途径的讨论。相较而言,现行法律框架下运用行政程序重开理论破解冒名婚姻登记救济困境,具有更强的实践必要性、现实优越性、理论正当性与司法可救济性。
Administrative litigation concerning fraudulent marriage registration,especially cases occurring prior to the enactment of the new Administrative Litigation Law,has long posed a dilemma for people's courts in balancing the application of the statutory time limits with the fundamental rights of the relief seeking parties.The judicial decision to invalidate and delete the registration information in the case of"Shang suing Rudong County Civil Affairs Bureau regarding marriage administrative registration"brought new idea for resolving such disputes,but it also raised questions about the legality of the judgment method and discussions about whether there are other statutory remedies available for such administrative disputes that fail to meet the prosecution conditions.In comparison,the application of the administrative procedure reopening theory under the current legal framework demonstrates greater practical necessity,realistic superiority,theoretical legitimacy,and judicial remediability in addressing the relief challenges posed by fraudulent marriage registration.
作者
张丽颖
ZHANG Li-ying(Law School,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出处
《太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2026年第1期89-97,共9页
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
冒名婚姻登记
起诉条件限制
行政程序重开
可诉性
fraudulent marriage registration
restrictions on prosecution conditions
administrative proce
