摘要
从宪法视角审视比较法研究方法,不仅能揭示该方法的历史嬗变与特征,也有助于彰显其在部门法中的应用价值。近二十年来,比较宪法学的研究聚焦于司法审查与基本权利两大领域,此研究焦点深刻地塑造了其方法的演变路径。具体而言,宏观比较趋于式微,微观比较日益频繁;历史与文化的比较方法备受重视;静态与动态比较则呈现交融互鉴之势。未来,为推动学科发展,应在研究方法上着力拓展其应用范围,并促进功能主义与文化主义的深度融合。
Applying a constitutional perspective to comparative law research methodologies provides valuable insights into their historical evolution,defining characteristics,and practical applicability.Over the past two decades,comparative constitutional law scholarship has focused primarily on judicial review and fundamental rights;this emphasis has significantly shaped the field’s methodological development and evolution.In comparative constitutional scholarship,historical and cultural comparative approaches have gained increasing scholarly attention.Macro-level comparative methods have become less common,whereas micro-level methods are now employed more frequently.Static and dynamic comparative approaches are increasingly integrated and applied jointly.To further advance the development of comparative constitutional law,greater emphasis should be placed on broadening the scope of these methodologies and on integrating functionalist and culturalist approaches.
出处
《社会科学论坛》
2025年第6期239-246,共8页
Tribune of Social Sciences
关键词
比较法学
比较宪法学
司法审查
基本权利
功能主义
文化主义
Comparative Law
Comparative Constitutional Law
judicial review
fundamental rights
functionalism
culturalism
