摘要
随着土地征收补偿协议立约主体的日渐多元,诉讼中的适格被告判定问题引发争议。法律与行政法规规定职权主体立约并作为适格被告,但行政法规与地方性法规的模糊性为通过法规授权扩张职权主体范围留下了解释空间。在裁判中,法院坚持以职权主体为适格被告,根据地方政府征补工作规定确定职权主体,以行政委托解释其他主体立约,导致职权主体身份趋于开放,未能明确适格被告判定规则,不利于争议解决。土地征收补偿协议立约主体的多元化实为实施行政授权和公私合作行政的结果。可将行政授权主体、被授权主体及立约合作主体组合成不可拆分的复合结构,作为个案中的土地征收补偿职权主体,并以共同被告形态成为土地征收补偿协议诉讼中的适格被告。
With the diversification of the subject of land acquisition and compensation contract,the judgment of the eligible defendant in the litigation has caused controversy.Laws and administrative regulations stipulate that the statutory authority should make the contract and be the eligible defendant,still the fuzziness of administrative regulations and local regulations leaves room to expand the scope of the of authority through statutory authorization.In judging,the court took the statutory authority as the eligible defendant,determined the subject of statutory authority according to the specific provisions of the local government's acquisition and compensation work,and interpreted other subjects'contract making by administrative commission.As a result,the identity of the statutory authority tends to open up,it also leads to the failure to clarify the rules for the determination of eligible defendants,and brings no benefits to dispute resolution.The diversification of the subject of land acquisition and compensation contract is the result of administrative authorization and public-private cooperation administration.The administrative authorization subject,the authorized entity and cooperation subject can be combined into an inseparable composite structure.This combination is the land acquisition and compensation authority in the case,as well as the eligible defendant in litigation.
出处
《中国不动产法研究》
2025年第2期109-132,351,352,共26页
Research on Real Estate Law of China
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“加强耕地保护领域立法研究”(项目编号:23AZD042)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
征收
土地征收补偿协议
职权主体
行政授权
Acquisition
Land Acquisition and Compensation Contract
Authority
Administrative Authorization
