摘要
生态文明建设目标评价考核是一项重要的生态文明制度措施,经历了制度萌芽、体系构建、制度再整合等发展阶段,形成党政机关、党政主要责任人、特殊区域生态文明建设情况三类评价考核安排。在指标设置上,已有评价考核指标存在内容缺漏与重复问题,影响到制度成效发挥。在考核方式上,评价考核者未认识到得分制或扣分制、比例计分制、公式或指数计分制三种策略的局限性,导致评价考核结果无法合理约束与引导党政主体行为。为了消除生态文明建设目标评价考核的制度弊病,有必要在指标设置与考核中合理利用“数目字管理”模式,并在国家治理视域下实现评价考核工作的央地联动,形成科学的指标设置与应用方案。
The evaluation and assessment of ecological progress targets is a key institutional measure for ecological conservation,having gone through development stages including the budding stage of the system,the construction of the framework,and the reintegration of the system.With three assessment frameworks now in place,it covers Party and government bodies,principal Party and government officials,and the progress of ecological conservation in specific regions.In terms of indicator setting,there are deficiencies and duplications in the existing evaluation and assessment indicators,which affect the effectiveness of the system.In terms of assessment ways,the evaluators have failed to recognize the limitations of the three calculation strategies—scoring or deduction system,proportional scoring system,formula or index scoring system,resulting in the inability to reasonably constrain and guide the behavior of Party and government entities in the evaluation and assessment results.In order to eliminate the institutional drawbacks of the evaluation and assessment of ecological civilization construction goals,it is necessary to make reasonable use of the numerical management model in indicator setting and calculation,and achieve central local linkage in evaluation and assessment work from the perspective of national governance,thus forming a scientific indicator setting and application plan.
作者
陈海嵩
周旭
CHEN Hai-song;ZHOU Xu
出处
《中国地质大学学报(社会科学版)》
北大核心
2025年第6期20-32,共13页
Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“新时代生态文明建设目标评价考核制度优化研究”(22&ZD138)。
关键词
生态文明建设
目标评价考核
数目字管理
央地关系
国家治理视域
ecological civilization construction
evaluation and assessment of goals
numerical management
central-local relations
the perspective of national governance
