期刊文献+

新质生产力赋能全球生态危机应对:作用路径与优化策略

New Quality Productivity Empowering the Response to Global Ecological Crises:Operational Paths and Optimization Strategies
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 气候变化、生物多样性减少与环境污染(含废弃物)等交织共振的全球生态危机,深刻暴露了传统线性发展模式的结构性困境与生态不可持续性,倒逼全球发展范式向绿色、低碳转型。在此背景下,中国将生态文明建设与绿色低碳发展纳入国家战略核心议程,明确提出加快培育以全要素生产率显著跃升为核心标识、以绿色化与智能化为内在特征的新质生产力。作为驱动中国经济高质量发展的核心引擎,新质生产力也是赋能全球生态危机应对的关键动能。它从物质供给、制度创新与理念引领三个维度,依托科技助推、产业带动、要素优化、主体支撑等九大路径,持续为全球生态环境治理注入中国力量。这一过程不仅夯实了全球绿色发展的物质基础,完善了全球绿色治理的制度框架与多边机制,而且凝聚了全球绿色发展的价值共识。为更有效地赋能全球生态危机应对,中国在新质生产力发展中需进一步推动“数”、“绿”的深度融合,突破清洁能源关键技术以强化危机应对技术根基;加快产业绿色低碳转型,构建高质量绿色产业生态以夯实危机应对的产业支撑;深化全球绿色合作,以新质生产力驱动绿色技术共享与产业协作,筑牢危机应对的协同根基。 The global ecological crisis,characterized by the interweaving and resonance of climate change,biodiversity loss,and environmental pollution(including waste),has profoundly exposed the structural predicaments and ecological unsustainability of the traditional linear development model,forcing a global transition towards a green and low-carbon development paradigm.Against this backdrop,China has incorporated ecological civilization construction and green low-carbon development into the core agenda of its national strategy,and clearly proposed accelerating the cultivation of new quality productivity——characterized by a marked leap in total factor productivity as its core symbol and greening and intellectualization as its inherent features.As the core engine driving China's high-quality economic development,new-quality productivity also serves as a key driving force empowering the global response to ecological crises.Through three dimensions—material supply,institutional innovation,and conceptual guidance—and relying on nine major pathways,including technological empowerment,industrial driving,factor optimization,and subject support,they continuously inject Chinese strength into global ecological governance.This process has not only consolidated the material foundation for global green development and improved the institutional framework and multilateral mechanisms of global green governance,but also fostered consensus on the values of global green development.To more effectively empower the global response to ecological crises,China,in developing its new quality productivity,must further promote the deep integration of"digitalization"and"greening"1It needs to break through key clean energy technologies to strengthen the technological foundation for crisis response;deepen the green and low-carbon transition of industries to build a high-quality green industrial ecosystem and solidify the industrial support for crisis response;and enhance global green collaboration to reinforce the international empowering role of green technologies and industries,thereby securing a cooperative foundation for tackling the crisis.
作者 肖兰兰 刘雅雯 XIAO Lanlan;LIU Yawen(School of Marxism,Nanjing University of Science and Technology)
出处 《南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 2025年第5期28-38,共11页 Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“‘双碳’目标下中国提升全球气候治理影响力的战略研究”(23ZDA112)。
关键词 全球生态危机 新质生产力 绿色发展 全球贡献 global ecological crisis new quality productivity green development global contribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献22

  • 1托尼·麦克格鲁.走向真正的全球治理[A].李惠斌主编.全球化与公民社会[C].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2003..
  • 2赖纳·特茨拉夫.全球化压力下的世界文化:导论 [M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2001..
  • 3汤因比.历史研究:第一部·绪论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1959..
  • 4鲍曼.后现代伦理学[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2003..
  • 5鲍曼著.流动的现代性[M].上海:上海三联书店,2002..
  • 6罗米拉·塔帕.一个不明确的理想[A].张穗华.通往自由之路[C].北京:中国对外翻译出版公司,2003..
  • 7亨廷顿.第三波--20世纪后期民主化浪潮,第一章第三节"历史上的民主化浪潮"[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998..
  • 8戴维·赫尔德.民主与全球秩序--从现代国家到世界主义治理,导论·第二节"民主、全球化与国际治理[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003..
  • 9亨廷顿.第四部分第八章"西方和非西方,文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建,文明间的问题"[M].北京:新华出版社,1998..
  • 10孔汉思.全球伦理:世界宗教议会宣言[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1997..

共引文献1793

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部