期刊文献+

政策工具视角下我国省域应急产业发展的驱动路径研究——基于29省的定性比较分析 被引量:1

Research on the Driving Path of Provincial Emergency Industry Development from the Perspective of Policy Tools——A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on 29 Provinces
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 应急产业作为国家战略性新兴产业,其高质量发展依赖于产业政策的驱动。该文依据ROTHWELLZEGVELD政策工具分类框架,将应急产业政策划分为供给型、环境型、需求型三类,从中选取9个高频政策工具作为条件变量,运用定性比较分析(QCA)方法对驱动我国应急产业发展的政策条件组合进行分析。结果显示:存在7条影响应急产业发展水平的政策工具组合有效路径,结合核心条件的异同,可归并为科技助推型、政府调控型和全面支持型三种驱动应急产业发展的政策工具组态路径,为产业政策驱动应急产业发展提供理论解释和实证支持。 As a national strategic emerging industry,the high-quality development of the emergency industry relies on the driving force of industrial policies.Based on the ROTHWELL and ZEGVELD policy tool classification frameworks,emergency industry policies are divided into three categories:supply oriented,environmental oriented,and demand oriented.Nine high-frequency policy tools are selected as conditional variables,and qualitative comparative analysis(QCA)is used to analyze the combination of policy conditions that drive the development of China's emergency industry.The results show that there are 7 effective policy tool combinations that affect the development level of the emergency industry.Based on the similarities and differences in core conditions,they can be merged into three policy tool configuration paths that drive the development of the emergency industry:technology assisted,government regulated,and comprehensive support.This provides theoretical explanations and empirical support for industrial policies to drive the development of the emergency industry.
作者 陈舒婷 容志 CHEN Shuting;RONG Zhi(School of Political and Public Administration,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出处 《灾害学》 北大核心 2025年第4期165-171,共7页 Journal of Catastrophology
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目“应急管理基础理论研究”(24FGLB013)。
关键词 应急产业 应急产业政策 政策工具 定性比较分析(QCA) emergency industry emergency industrial policy policy instruments Qualitative Comparative Analysis(QCA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

共引文献3694

同被引文献19

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部