摘要
为了推动企业碳减排和促进动力电池回收工作,政府分别制定了碳限额交易政策和补贴政策。本文构建了动力电池制造商主导的,与整车制造商及第三方回收商组成的动力电池闭环供应链,研究碳限额交易政策下补贴动力电池制造商、补贴回收商和补贴消费者三种策略下动力电池回收供应链最优决策。此外,本文构建了单渠道垄断回收、混合回收和联盟回收三种回收模式,并对不同回收模式下的供应链决策、利润和回收率进行比较。研究结果表明:(1)动力电池回收正向供应链决策受碳限额交易政策和回收模式的影响,而补贴政策只影响逆向供应链决策;(2)碳限额交易政策改善了动力电池回收供应链利润,表现在碳配额和碳价的上升均有利于动力电池回收供应链利润的增加,而碳价的上升导致回收率表现不佳;(3)补贴政策改善了供应链利润和回收率,补贴动力电池制造商或回收商的回收率总是优于补贴消费者;(4)碳限额交易政策与补贴政策对供应链的影响不受回收模式的影响,但联盟回收模式的供应链利润与回收率比单渠道回收和混合回收更优。
To promote the power battery recycling work and promote the carbon emission reduction of enterprises,the government launched carbon cap-and-trade mechanism and subsidy policy,to explore the impact of the government subsidy strategy choice on the decision-making of the power battery recycling supply chain under cap-and-trade mechanism,a closed-loop supply chain led by power battery manufacturer and composed of the vehicle manufacturer and third-party recycler is constructed,and the optimal decision-making of the power battery recycling supply chain under the three strategies of subsidized power battery manufacturer is studied.In addition,three recycling models are constructed:single-channel monopoly recycling,mixed recycling and alliance recycling,and the supply chain decision-making,profit and recycling rate under different recycling models are compared.Results show that(1)The forward supply chain decision of power battery recycling is affected by the carbon cap-and-trade mechanism and recycling models,while the subsidy policy only affects the reverse supply chain decision;(2)The carbon cap-and-trade mechanism improves the profits of the power battery recycling supply chain,showing that the increase of carbon quota and carbon price is conducive to the increase of the profit of the power battery recycling supply chain,while the increase of carbon price leads to poor recovery performance;(3)Subsidy policies improve supply chain profits and recycling rates,and the recycling rate of subsidized power battery manufacturers or recyclers is always better than that of subsidized consumers;(4)The impact of carbon cap-and-trade mechanism and subsidy policy on the supply chain is not affected by the recycling mode,but the supply chain profit and recovery rate of the alliance recycling mode are better than that of single-channel recycling and mixed recycling.
作者
武文琪
张明
Wu Wenqi;Zhang Ming(School of Economics and Management,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China)
出处
《中国管理科学》
北大核心
2025年第8期340-354,共15页
Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(72174195,72243002)
江苏省哲学社会科学基金项目(24GLB025)。
关键词
闭环供应链
动力电池回收
回收模式
碳限额交易政策
政府补贴
power battery recycling
closed-loop supply chain
recycling model
cap-and-trade mechanism
government subsidy
