摘要
《艺文类聚》的“文”体和《文心雕龙》“杂文”有一致之处,实际上也是文类概念,所收文章皆不属主流文体,既有可归入已成熟文体者,又有文体性质尚有争议或并不能独立成体者,又收录一些难以归体的篇目,较《文心雕龙》“杂文”概念更为宽泛。《艺文类聚》的杂文观影响着后世的类书和总集,它们多以“杂文”兼收非主流文体和难以归体的文章。但随着时代的发展,有总集对“杂文”进行了新的探索,一些反映了唐以后创作的新气象,列“杂著”“古文”,或仍以“杂文”,收录古文家所作篇幅短小、以小见大、寓意深远的篇章;或有总集突破编纂传统,从经、史、子文献选录篇章,归入“杂文”,探索着经、史、子入集归体的新路径。
"Wen"style of Yiwenleiju shares key similarities with"Zawen"ofWenxindiaolong.In fact,it was also the concept of genre.The articles collected were not the mainstream style,but some of them could be classified as mature style,some of them could be classified as small amount of creation,relatively narrow extension,controversial style nature,and some of them were difficult to be classified.Compared with Wenxindiaolong,the definition of"Wen"in Yiwenleiju was broader.This expansive understanding of"Zawen"in Yiwenleiju had influenced the compilation strategies of the later classified books and collections,which mostly used the term to incorporate marginal or unclassifiable texts.Over time,some collections began to innovate within"Zawen".Reflecting the new atmosphere of creation after the Tang Dynasty,they adopted new labels such as"zazhu"("miscellaneous writings")or"guwen"("ancient prose"),or continued to use"Zawen"to encompass concise,meaningful,and suggestive works written by ancient writers.Others broke with compilation conventions by incorporating texts from"jing"(Classics),"shi"(History),and"zi"(Masters)traditions into"Zawen,"thus exploring new approaches to textual classification and genre inclusion.
作者
赵俊玲
ZHAO Junling(College of Literature,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
基金
河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“历代编选汉魏六朝诗文总集研究”(2022BWX028)。
