摘要
商事仲裁司法审查中“公共政策”条款的适用争议,已成为影响仲裁裁决效力与跨国执行的重要问题。由于公共政策概念抽象、立法原则性强,各国在司法实践中对其理解和适用存在显著差异,导致一系列的问题。此类争议不仅影响仲裁的确定性和效率,还引发国家利益与当事人权益之间的冲突。本文通过分析国际公约与国内立法中公共政策条款的演进及其功能定位,揭示其在司法审查中的异化表现,并探讨成因。为解决争议,建议明确公共政策内涵与适用边界,规范审查程序,强化听证与举证机制,并推动国际间规则协调与司法合作。制度完善与国际合作,有助于实现仲裁自主性与司法监督间的平衡,提升商事仲裁的公信力与可预期性。
concept and strong legislative principles of public policy,there are significant differences in the understanding and application of it in judicial practice among countries,leading to a series of problems.Such disputes not only affect the certainty and efficiency of arbitration,but also trigger conflicts between national interests and the rights and interests of the parties.This article analyzes the evolution and functional positioning of public policy provisions in international conventions and domestic legislation,reveals their alienation in judicial review,and explores the causes.To resolve disputes,it is recommended to clarify the connotation and application boundaries of public policies,standardize review procedures,strengthen hearing and evidence mechanisms,and promote international rule coordination and judicial cooperation.Institutional improvement and international cooperation help achieve a balance between arbitration autonomy and judicial supervision,enhancing the credibility and predictability of commercial arbitration.
作者
许皓
Hao Xu(Jiangsu Boshida Law Firm,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210000)
出处
《法学学刊》
2025年第3期97-99,共3页
Journal of Law
关键词
商事仲裁
司法审查标准
“公共政策”条款
适用争议
commercial arbitration
judicial review standards
"Public Policy"clause
applicable disputes
