期刊文献+

三维坚毅量表中文版在大学生群体的信效度检验和跨性别测量等值性

The Validation of the Chinese Version of Three-dimensional Grit Scale for Undergraduates and Measurement Invariance Across Gender
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:对三维坚毅量表进行中文修订,并在大学生群体中检验其信效度和跨性别测量等值性。方法:对1031名大学生施测,以坚毅量表、大五人格尽责性分量表和生活满意度量表作为效标,间隔4周后对其中239名被试重测。结果:该量表各项目区分度良好。验证性因素分析結果表明,三因素模型拟合良好(χ^(2)=146.402,df=116,CFI=0.992,TLI=0.990,RMSEA=0.023,SRMR=0.065)。总量表和各维度与效标之间呈显著正相关。量表的McDonald’sω系数为0.913,重测信度系数为0.745。量表具有跨性别的强等值性。结论:三维坚毅量表中文版具有良好的信效度且具备跨性别测量等值性,可作为评估我国大学生坚毅品质的有效工具。 Objective:To revise the three-dimensional grit scale(3-D CS)in Chinese and to test its reliability,validity and measurement invariance across gender for undergraduates.Methods:A total of 1031 undergraduates were recruited to complete the questionnaire survey,including original 12-item grit scale,conscientiousness subscale,and satisfaction with life scale as criteria,and 239 of them were retested after a 4-week interval.Results:All items of the 3-D GS had good discrimination.Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the construct of this scale excellently fited in the three-correlated factor model(χ^(2)=146.402,df-116,CFI=0.992,TLI=0.990,RMSEA=0.023,SRMR=0.065).The scores of the scale were moderately positively correlated with all criterion scales.The McDonald's coefficient of the scale was 0.913 and the testretest reliability coefficient was 0.745.The scale exhibited strong invariance across gender.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the 3-D GS presents good reliability and validity,and could be used as a tool to measure the grit for Chinese undergraduates.
作者 李承杰 阳莉华 颜银梅 何键辉 张发豪 LI Chengchieh;YANG Lihua;YAN Yinmei;HE Jianhui;ZHANG Fahao(Department of Psychology,Asia University,Taichung 413305,China;School of Education and Psychology,Minnan Normal University,Zhangzhou 363000,China;Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Cognition and Personality,Zhangzhou 363000,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 北大核心 2025年第4期676-680,710,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 福建省教育科学规划常规课题资助(课题编号:FJJKBK24-024)。
关键词 大学生 坚毅 信度 效度 测量等值性 Undergraduate Grit Reliability Validity Measurement invariance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献28

  • 1戴晓阳,吴依泉.NEO-PI-R在16~20岁人群中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18. 被引量:21
  • 2辛自强,池丽萍.快乐感与社会支持的关系[J].心理学报,2001,33(5):442-447. 被引量:270
  • 3邱林,郑雪.主观幸福感的结构及其与人格特质的关系[J].应用心理学,2005,11(4):330-335. 被引量:58
  • 4Lucas Richard E,Diener Ed, Eunkook Suh. Discriminant Validity of Well-Being Measures[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996,71 (3) : 616-628.
  • 5Diener Ed,Suh Eunkook M. Subjective Well-Being :Three Decades of Progress[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1999,125(2):276-302.
  • 6Matt Vassar. A Note on the Score Reliability for the Satisfaction with Life Scale: an RG Study[J]. Social Indictors Research, 2008, 86:47-57.
  • 7Watson D, Clark L A, TeUegen A. Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect : The PANAS Scales [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54 (6): 1063-1070.
  • 8Campbell A. Subjective measures of well-being[J]. American psychologist, 1976,31 : 117-124.
  • 9John OP, Naumann LR, Soto CJ. Paradigm shift to the inte- grative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual Issues. In John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: The Guilford Press, 2008. 114-158.
  • 10Burisch M. You don't always get what you pay for: Measur- ing depression with short and simple versus long and so- phisticated scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 1984, 18:81-98.

共引文献724

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部