摘要
在“南海仲裁案”中,菲律宾及其专家片面解读中国台湾地区方面的调查资料及其他文献,否认太平岛能够维持人类定居的客观事实。“仲裁庭”一方面对菲之论予以否定,并列举英日航海文献、调查报告等非优势证据证明这些岛屿之上有淡水供应;另一方面又以“地物显然不适合居住”来定位岛屿的淡水问题。诸多航海文献、调查报告等相关资料,足以证明这些岛屿的淡水供应能够满足岛上人群生存的需要。
In“the South China Sea Arbitration Case”,the Philippines and its experts selectively interpreted Taiwan(region) of China survey data and other documents to deny the objective fact that Taiping Island was capable of sustaining human habita-tion.The“arbitral tribunal”,on one hand,rejected the Philippines’arguments and cited British and Japanese naviga-tional records,survey reports,and other non-conclusive evidence to confirm the availability of freshwater on these is-lands.On the other hand,it paradoxically concluded that the geographical features were manifestly unsuitable for habita-tion in assessing freshwater issue on the islands.Numerous navigational documents,investigation reports,and related ma-terials,are sufficient to prove that the freshwater supply on these islands can sustain human survival.
作者
王静
WANG Jing(School of Marxism,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China)
出处
《海南热带海洋学院学报》
2025年第4期10-18,共9页
Journal of Hainan Tropical Ocean University
基金
国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(24FZSB063)。
关键词
菲律宾
“南海仲裁案”
太平岛
淡水
the Philippines
“the South China Sea Arbitration Case”
Taiping Island
freshwater
