摘要
被盗文物跨国权属争议的解决长期受困于传统冲突规则的僵化性。本文以西蒙尼德斯提出的“带有实体法色彩的冲突规则”为研究对象,通过解构其“冲突分类-实质正义融入”的双层机理,揭示该规则对政府利益分析说的批判性创新:以当事人实体权益衡平替代政府利益较量,构建原属国法推定与例外条款结合的弹性框架。研究表明,该规则虽在形式严谨性与价值突破性上具有显著优势,却面临原属国认定模糊、裁量失衡及司法成本高昂等实践挑战。基于此,我国应建立“以被盗时物之所在地法为原则、诉讼时物之所在地法为例外”的专门冲突规范,实现文化正义与交易安全的平衡。
Transnational ownership disputes over stolen cultural property remain hindered by rigid traditional conflict rules.This paper focuses on Symeonides's Une Règle de Conflit à Coloration Matérielle.By deconstructing its dual-layer mechanism of"conflict classification-integration of substantive justice,"this rule critically innovates upon Governmental Interest Analysis:replacing governmental interest balancing with equitable consideration of parties'substantive rights,thereby constructing a flexible framework combining presumption of lex originis with escape clauses.The study demonstrates that while this rule holds significant advantages in formal rigor and groundbreaking value,it faces practical challenges including ambiguous identification of countries of origin,discretionary imbalances,and high judicial costs.Accordingly,China should establish specialized conflict rules adopting"lex rei sitae at the time of theft as the principle,and lex rei sitae at litigation time as the exception"to balance cultural justice and transactional security.
作者
宁孟丹
NING Mengdan(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430000)
出处
《牡丹江大学学报》
2025年第7期18-28,共11页
Journal of Mudanjiang University
关键词
文物
带有实体法色彩的冲突规则
政府利益分析说
原属国法
cultural property
Une Règle De ConflitàColoration Matérielle
governmental interest analysis
lex originis
