摘要
近年来,帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪数量维持高位,司法裁判出现“超实证法”倾向。主观“明知”存在类推解释嫌疑、正犯缺位或扩张超过文义解释边界、“情节严重”未发挥出罪功能、相关规定较为粗糙等问题都对罪刑法定原则构成挑战。有必要回归“李斯特鸿沟”,在司法中划定刑事政策和刑法教义学的边界,对帮信罪的司法适用进行限缩解释。
In recent years,the incidence of crimes related to the assisting information network has remained at a high level,accompanied by a phenomenon referred to as“super empirical law”in judicial decisions.From a subjective perspective,concerns arise regarding the potential for analogical interpretation,the absence or overextension of the principal offender beyond the scope of textual interpretation,and the inability of the“serious circumstances”criterion to effectively fulfill its definitional function within the criminal framework.Additionally,the relatively vague and underdeveloped nature of the relevant provisions poses significant challenges to the principle of legality in criminal law.Against this backdrop,it is essential to revisit the“Liszt divide,”clearly demarcate the boundaries between criminal policy and criminal doctrine in judicial practice,and adopt a restrained interpretative approach to the judicial application of the assisting information network criminal activities.
作者
欧阳文婷
OUYANG Wen-ting(Law School,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《山西青年职业学院学报》
2025年第2期1-6,27,共7页
Journal of Shanxi Youth Vocational College
关键词
帮信罪
罪刑法定原则
明知
情节严重
限缩解释
assisting information network crimes
principle of legality
subjective knowing
serious circumstances
limited interpretation
