期刊文献+

神经源性膀胱患者间歇导尿自我效能感量表的汉化及信效度检验

Sinicization and Reliability-Validity Testing of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Intermittent Catheterization in Patients with Neurogenic Bladder
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:对神经源性膀胱患者间歇导尿自我效能感量表进行汉化,并检验其信效度。方法:采用Brislin的翻译模型,对间歇导尿自我效能感量表进行翻译、回译和文化调适形成中文版的间歇导尿自我效能感量表,并对2021年9月~2024年9月进行清洁间歇导尿的神经源性膀胱患者212例进行问卷调查,用Cronbach’sα评估量表的信度,用组内相关系数评估量表的内容效度。结果:英文原版量表有16个条目,中文版量表保留了16个。问卷结果显示,整个量表的内容效度指数为0.98,Cronbach’sα是0.952。结论:中文版的间歇导尿自我效能感量表具有较好的信效度,该量表适合中国文化背景下对神经源性膀胱患者进行评价和测量。 Objective:To sinicize the Self-Efficacy Scale for Intermittent Catheterization in patients with neurogenic bladder and to test its reliability and validity.Methods:Using the Brislin translation model,the Self-Efficacy Scale for Intermittent Catheterization was translated,back-translated,and culturally adapted to form a Chinese version.A survey was conducted among 212 patients with neurogenic bladder who underwent clean intermittent catheterization from September 2021 to September 2024.Cronbach’sαwas used to assess the reliability of the scale,and the intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the content validity of the scale.Results:The original English scale had 16 items,and the Chinese version retained all 16 items.The survey results showed that the content validity index of the entire scale was 0.98,and the Cronbach’sαwas 0.952.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Intermittent Catheterization has good reliability and validity and is suitable for evaluating and measuring patients with neurogenic bladder in the Chinese cultural context.
作者 高杰 张宏 卢吉 范莹 王冰花 刘莉 徐海艳 GAO Jie;ZHANG Hong;LU Ji;FAN Ying;WANG Binghua;LIU Li;XU Haiyan(Department of Nursing,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,China)
出处 《神经损伤与功能重建》 2025年第8期494-496,共3页 Neural Injury and Functional Reconstruction
基金 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院基金(基于数字疗法的宫颈癌根治术后膀胱功能障碍预防模式的构建,No.2022D05)。
关键词 神经源性膀胱 间歇导尿 自我效能感量表 信度 效度 neurogenic bladder intermittent catheterization self-efficacy scale reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献59

共引文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部