摘要
合理评估世界一流学科建设政策对科研产出质量的影响及其在地区、学科层面的差异性,对调整和优化世界一流学科建设政策具有重要的实践意义。以世界一流学科建设政策的实施为准自然实验,构建多时点双重差分模型,基于343个学科在2014—2023年的数据,从国内和国际视角分析世界一流学科建设政策对科研产出质量的影响及其差异。结果表明:(1)世界一流学科建设政策显著提升了入选学科在国际期刊上发表成果的质量,说明世界一流学科建设政策通过科研资源的分配效应,弱化了国内期刊成果发表的“内卷”竞争,提升了科研成果的国际竞争力;(2)分地区来看,世界一流学科建设政策对中西部地区入选学科在国际期刊上发表成果的质量影响大于东部地区,而对东部地区入选学科在国内期刊上发表成果的质量具有负向效应;(3)分学科类型看,世界一流学科建设政策显著提升了理工类入选学科在国际期刊上发表成果的质量,但对人文社科类入选学科在国际期刊上发表成果的质量影响有限,且对该类入选学科在国内期刊上发表成果的质量具有负向影响。未来政策优化应注重学科间的均衡发展,加大对中西部地区入选学科的政策支持力度,深化本土特色研究,凝练学科特色发展,深入推动学科高质量发展。
A reasonable assessment of the impact of the policies for constructing world-class disciplines on the quality of research output,as well as its variations across regions and disciplines,holds significant practical importance for adjusting and optimizing these policies.Taking the world-class discipline construction policy as a quasi-natural experiment,a multi-time difference-in-differences(MTDID)model was constructed and the data from 343 disciplines spanning the period from 2014 to 2023 were used to analyze the impact and variations of the world-class discipline construction policy on the quality of research output from both domestic and international perspectives.The results show that:firstly,the policy for constructing world-class disciplines significantly improved the quality of achievements published by selected disciplines in international journals,indicating that the policy for constructing world-class disciplines weakened the“involution”competition of achievements published in domestic journals through the distribution effect of scientific research resources,and enhanced the international competitiveness of scientific research achievements;secondly,from the perspective of regions,the policy for constructing world-class disciplines had a greater impact on the quality of achievements published by selected disciplines in international journals in central and western regions than in eastern regions,while the quality of achievements published by selected disciplines in domestic journals in eastern regions showed a negative effect;thirdly,from the perspective of discipline types,the policy for constructing world-class disciplines significantly improved the quality of achievements published by selected science and engineering disciplines in international journals,but had a limited impact on the quality of achievements published by selected humanities and social science disciplines in international journals,and had a negative impact on the quality of achievements published by these selected disciplines in domestic journals.In this regard,future policy optimization should focus on the balanced development of disciplines,increase policy support for disciplines in central and western regions,deepen local characteristic research,cultivate characteristic development of disciplines,and vigorously promote the high-quality development of disciplines.
作者
杭建琴
HANG Jianqin(Research Center for Language and Language Education,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
出处
《重庆高教研究》
北大核心
2025年第4期35-46,共12页
Chongqing Higher Education Research
基金
全国教育科学规划一般项目“高质量发展背景下中国一流大学社会服务能力建设研究”(BIA220080)。
