摘要
《ICSID公约》所建立的承认与执行机制是国际法与国内法混合的产物。由于国际法与国内法的演化,ICSID裁决的可承认性与可执行性经历了既有“扩张”又有“限制”的嬗变。有关欧盟内部ICSID裁决执行的Micula案也暴露出裁决的可执行性有被其他条约否定的危机,并且引发各国在此事项上的分歧。随着我国在国家豁免立场的逐步转变,在我国执行不利于主权国家的ICSID裁决成为可能。我国宜妥善维护ICSID裁决的可承认性与可执行性,采取措施建立与《ICSID公约》的衔接机制,积极以“维护者”的角色参与全球经贸的制度竞争。这不仅是对国际经济秩序变革的回应,同时也是我国涉外法治的题中之义。
The recognition and enforcement mechanism established by the ICSID Convention is a hybrid of international and domestic law.Due to the evolution of both legal systems,the recognizability and enforceability of ICSID awards have undergone a transformation characterized by both"expansion"and"restriction."The Micula case,has exposed the crisis where the enforceability of intra-EU ICSID awards may be denied by other treaties,leading to divergences among countries on this matter.As China gradually shifts its national stance on state immunity,the enforcement of ICSID awards adverse to States has become possible before Chinese courts.The Chinese judicial system should uphold the recognizability and enforceability of ICSID awards,taking measures to establish implementing rules of the ICSID Convention,and actively participate in the global economic and trade institutional competition as a‘guardian'.This approach not only responds to the changes in the international economic order but also reinforces China's commitment to foreign-related rule of law.
出处
《国际经济法学刊》
2025年第2期140-156,共17页
Journal of International Economic Law
基金
国家留学基金委员会资助。
