摘要
网络服务提供者间接侵权责任的认定事关服务提供者、权利人、用户的切身利益,有诸多悬而未决的难题。对此,应以“红旗规则”“避风港规则”作为侵权认定规则的“骨架”,进一步完善间接侵权责任认定规则。服务提供者违反“低层级注意义务”的,应当承担相应的补充责任;应当对“应当知道”内涵作规范解释,涵盖“推定知道”“因重大过失未知”两个维度;应当构建以“避风港规则”优先为中心的“避风港规则”与“红旗规则”竞合的法律适用规则,快速定分止争,为司法实践提供确定性指引,最大限度实现各方利益的衡平。
The determination of the indirect infringement liability of internet service providers concerns the vital interests of service providers,rights holders,and users,which has always received significant attention,though many unresolved issues remain.The“Red Flag Rule”and“Safe Harbor Rule”can serve as the framework for further refining the rules for determining indirect infringement liability.Service providers who violate the“low-level duty of care”should bear corresponding supplementary liability;the connotation of“should have known”should be normatively explained to encompass the dimensions of“presumed knowledge”and“unknown due to gross negligence”.A legal application rule should be established that prioritizes the“Safe Harbor Rule”while allowing for the concurrent application of the“Safe Harbor Rule”and“Red Flag Rule”,quickly resolving disputes and providing certainty for judicial practice,thereby maximizing the balance of interests among all parties.
作者
王秉昌
李永军
Wang Bingchang;Li Yongjun
出处
《学海》
北大核心
2025年第3期178-188,216,共12页
Academia Bimestris
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“公共性视角下的数据流通法律制度研究”(项目号:24BFX070)的阶段性成果。
