摘要
法学理论、法学教育、司法判断逻辑的理性主义传统,不当规避了情感因素在法律、司法中的存在,导致公众的正当情感需求与司法者运用法律的禁止性条款做出的裁判结果出现悖反。直接依据法律的禁止性条款进行处罚,往往产生违背常情的司法裁判结果,使得公众期待的个案正义难以实现。这要求司法者不能冷漠地坚守“不违法”这一底线,而应当带着法律的温度审视社会公众的喜怒哀乐,不断深入领会法律的精神,提升法律的理解、适用能力。司法判断的方式应是分层次的,对不存在“事实之真”与“法律之真”分歧的简单案件,判断时应更注重公众的正当情感,在司法过程中实现法的价值,优化司法方式,尽量做到国法、天理、人情的协调统一,从而避免机械司法造成的表面符合法律效果实则产生负面社会效果的情况。
The rationalist traditions of legal theory,legal education,and judicial reasoning have improperly avoided acknowledging the role of emotions in law and jurisprudence.This oversight has led to a disconnect between the public's legitimate emotional needs and the outcomes of legal judgments based on prohibitive clauses.Rulings that strictly adhere to these clauses often result in verdicts that defy common sense,making it difficult to achieve justice in individual cases as espected by the public.Judges must not rigidly adhere to the baseline of“not illegal”but should instead consider the full spectrum of human emotions within society,continuously deepening their understanding of the spirit of the law to enhance their capability in interpreting and applying it.Judicial decision-making should be stratified;for straightforward cases without discrepancies between“factual truth”and“legal truth,”more emphasis should be placed on the public's legitimate emotions.By realizing the value of law in the judicial process,optimizing judicial methods,we can avoid the superficial compliance with the law that mechanical jurisprudence often entails,which can lead to negative social effects.
出处
《民间法》
2024年第3期164-179,共16页
基金
陕西省教育厅青年创新团队项目“革命根据地廉政法制建设的实践与经验研究”(编号:23JP177)
西北政法大学省部级科研机构项目“革命根据地廉政法制建设的制度经验研究”(编号:SJJG202309)
关键词
正当情感
体系解释
司法机械化
优化司法方式
Legitimate Emotions
Systematic Interpretation
Judicial Mechanization
Optimizing Judicial Methods
